Top 10 Letter of Credit Advisory Firms
Letters of credit look simple until you are facing a tight shipment window, a picky document set, and a bank that will not tolerate discrepancies.
If you want a clean baseline first, read what a documentary letter of credit is and how it works
and how to secure a letter of credit for international transactions.
This list highlights ten credible, widely recognised providers that support letter of credit structuring, execution, and adjacent trade finance work.
It is not an official league table. Use it to shortlist a partner, then choose based on fit, corridor, and your collateral reality.
Not sure whether you need a documentary letter of credit or a standby letter of credit, or both?
The wrong instrument choice can force amendments, delay shipment, and trigger cash collateral you did not plan for.
Compare SBLC vs DLC
What A Letter Of Credit Advisor Does
LC advisory is not just drafting wording. It is structuring the instrument so banks can approve it and so documents can be presented without predictable refusals.
In practice, a serious advisor should cover instrument choice, issuance route, confirmation approach, document workflow, and a funding plan that is executable.
- Instrument selection.
Documentary LC, standby LC, or a split structure for performance and payment.
- Rules alignment.
Terms that actually map to UCP 600 or ISP98 style presentation mechanics.
- Document set control.
Conditions that are possible to satisfy in the real world, not a fantasy list.
- Cash flow design.
For deferred payment structures, see the UPAS and UPAU LC guide.
- Stack awareness.
How LC, SBLC, proof of funds, and other instruments fit together.
If you need a quick reference, use this guide to trade finance instruments.
Top 10 Letter Of Credit Advisory Firms
1. Financely
Financely
supports letter of credit structuring and placement through regulated counterparties.
Our main advantage is building workable options for companies that do not have full collateral, plus arranging gap financing when the transaction needs extra capital to become bankable.
2. HSBC
HSBC
is a global trade bank supporting documentary credits, guarantees, and working capital solutions across major corridors.
Often a fit for established importers and exporters that value a consistent global operating model.
- Best for:
multi-jurisdiction trade flows with repeat cycles.
- Strength:
global network and mature trade operations.
- Constraint:
policy limits can tighten outcomes in higher-friction corridors.
3. Standard Chartered
Standard Chartered
has deep trade finance capability across Asia, Africa, and the Middle East.
Strong where controls, documents, and counterparties support a clean risk narrative.
- Best for:
emerging market corridors with bankable controls.
- Strength:
structured trade discipline and risk frameworks.
- Constraint:
strict compliance filters and sector policies.
4. Citi
Citi
supports trade instruments and working capital through a large corporate banking platform.
Often relevant where letters of credit sit inside a broader treasury and cash management setup.
- Best for:
corporates integrating trade with treasury.
- Strength:
systems and global execution consistency.
- Constraint:
bespoke wording can take longer through approvals.
5. JPMorgan Chase
JPMorgan
supports letters of credit and related trade solutions for corporate clients.
A fit when operational control, governance, and documentation discipline are non-negotiable.
- Best for:
scaled trading companies and large corporates.
- Strength:
execution discipline and risk oversight.
- Constraint:
conservative outcomes on smaller or bespoke profiles.
6. BNP Paribas
BNP Paribas
is a major European bank with broad trade finance capability, including documentary credits and guarantees.
Often relevant for Europe-linked flows and bank-led structures with clear compliance posture.
- Best for:
Europe-linked import and export businesses.
- Strength:
product depth and experienced trade desks.
- Constraint:
appetite varies by goods, corridor, and policy.
7. Deutsche Bank
Deutsche Bank
supports trade products including letters of credit and guarantees for corporates.
Often a fit when the documentation set and operating model are already tight.
- Best for:
controlled flows with clean documentation.
- Strength:
strong risk standards and trade expertise.
- Constraint:
narrower appetite for higher-friction profiles.
8. Santander
Santander
supports trade finance across Europe and the Americas.
Often relevant for Iberia and Latin America connected flows with repeatable patterns.
- Best for:
Europe and Americas corridors.
- Strength:
regional coverage and corporate banking base.
- Constraint:
execution experience can vary by booking centre.
9. Deloitte
Deloitte
supports corporates on trade process, controls, and risk work that intersects with LC operations.
Useful when the problem is part instrument, part workflow, part governance.
- Best for:
controls, policy, and operating model upgrades.
- Strength:
enterprise frameworks and risk discipline.
- Constraint:
financing execution remains with regulated providers.
10. PwC
PwC
supports treasury, risk, and operating model work that can improve LC usage and working capital outcomes.
Often relevant where trade processes span multiple entities and jurisdictions.
- Best for:
treasury-led governance and process redesign.
- Strength:
advisory breadth across risk, tax, and operations.
- Constraint:
facility execution remains with banks and credit providers.
Collateral-Light Structures That Still Clear Underwriting
If a bank asks for full cash collateral and you cannot cover it, the market is signalling that unsecured credit risk is not acceptable on your profile.
That does not mean the deal is dead. It means the transaction needs tighter controls, a clearer security story, and sometimes a separate gap tranche.
If collateral is your bottleneck, do not guess. Start with a clean, practical breakdown of what reduced collateral structures usually require,
and what lenders will still demand around controls, KYC, and proof of performance.
See Reduced Collateral Options
In many cases, the solution is a blended plan. Part margin, part short-tenor working capital, plus a gap facility when needed.
If you are mapping the broader toolkit, these references help: six types of trade finance
and different trade finance instruments to use.
Conversion Checklist: What To Send For A Fast LC Review
Want a serious answer fast? Send serious inputs. Here is the minimum pack that lets an advisor structure real options:
- Draft contract or proforma invoice
including Incoterms, delivery point, and payment terms.
- Counterparty details
including legal names, jurisdictions, and relationship history.
- Draft document list
requested under the LC, including inspection or certificates.
- Shipment plan
including lead time, partial shipments, and latest shipment date.
- Your funding gap
in one line: what margin you can post and what you cannot cover.
- Proof of funds context
if required by the seller. Start here: obtaining proof of funds for trade finance.
Apply For A Letter Of Credit Quote
If you have a real transaction and want an LC structure that can clear underwriting even with imperfect collateral, apply for a quote.
We revert with realistic options, including gap financing where required.
Apply For A Quote
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a letter of credit advisor?
A letter of credit advisor helps structure the instrument, align it with documentary rules, reduce discrepancy risk, and coordinate issuance routes and timelines around the contract.
Do I need 100% cash collateral for an LC or SBLC?
Often, yes, banks ask for full cash collateral when they do not want unsecured exposure. Reduced collateral is possible in stronger cases, usually with tighter controls and a better security story.
Use this guide on reduced collateral SBLC structures
as a baseline.
When should I use a documentary LC vs a standby LC?
Documentary LCs are built around document presentation for payment under trade shipments. Standby LCs are commonly used as a credit support or performance backstop.
Compare them here: standby letter of credit vs letter of credit
and SBLC vs DLC for your deal.
What is UPAS and why do buyers use it?
UPAS can pay the seller at sight while giving the buyer a usance repayment term, subject to bank terms and approvals.
See the UPAS and UPAU guide.
What is MT760 and why is it mentioned with SBLCs?
MT760 is a SWIFT message format often associated with standby issuance and advice flows, depending on the structure and banks involved.
For context, see the MT760 SBLC guide.
What are the most common reasons banks refuse documents?
Mismatched names, inconsistent dates, missing originals, late presentation, and document conditions that are hard to satisfy cleanly.
The fix is a realistic document set and a disciplined pre-check workflow.
Can you help if my transaction has a funding gap?
Yes, if the trade is real and the counterparties and documents are credible. The usual approach is a blended plan that combines instrument structuring with working capital and a gap tranche where needed.
Disclaimer: This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal, tax, financial, or investment advice.
Financing facilities are provided by regulated banks and credit providers under their own licences, documentation, and approvals, and remain subject to eligibility, KYC, AML, sanctions screening, and credit decisions.
Financely is not a bank, broker-dealer, or insurer, and does not guarantee issuance without underwriting and counterparty approvals.