MT-760 Standby Letter of Credit Guide and Service
An MT-760 Standby Letter of Credit is a bank undertaking transmitted over SWIFT. If the applicant fails to perform, the issuing bank pays the beneficiary against a compliant demand, up to the stated amount, before expiry and under the agreed rule set. Used correctly, an MT-760 can unlock shipment, secure EPC obligations, satisfy tender requirements, and support structured credit. Used badly, it becomes a slow loop of rejected wording, compliance delays, and last-minute amendments.
Financely does not issue SBLCs. We structure issuer-ready files and coordinate placement and execution through regulated counterparties. If you have limited collateral capacity, we focus on credit structure, controls, and gap solutions that can make issuance feasible without turning the instrument into a liability trap.
See our Structured Trade Finance
approach and our Asset-Based Lending
structuring options.
What Is an MT-760 SBLC
MT-760 is the SWIFT FIN message category used to issue a demand guarantee or standby letter of credit. It creates an authenticated bank-to-bank record and standardizes key fields so advising banks can verify and advise the undertaking. The legal enforceability is not “because it is SWIFT”. It is because it is a contractual bank undertaking governed by a recognized rule set and the governing law stated in the instrument.
Rule Sets That Matter
Most standbys are issued under ISP98 because it is designed for standby practice and deals cleanly with non-documentary conditions, partial drawings, and presentation mechanics. UCP 600 is common for documentary credits and is used where the commercial context demands it. Demand guarantees often reference URDG 758.
External standards worth reading, not guessing.
MT-760 vs MT-700 vs MT-799
- MT-700
is the issuance message for a documentary credit, typically governed by UCP 600.
- MT-760
is the issuance message for a demand guarantee or standby letter of credit, often governed by ISP98 or URDG 758.
- MT-799
is a free-format message commonly used for pre-advice or narrative communication. It is not a payment undertaking.
Where MT-760 SBLCs Are Used
The highest-quality use cases are simple: a real contract, a real counterparty, and a clear risk that the SBLC addresses. In trade and projects, the instrument sits inside a broader structure that includes KYC, sanctions screening, and documentary controls.
Commodity Trade and Repetitive Flows
Sellers may ship on terms when they have a standby from an acceptable issuer, especially where the buyer wants working capital breathing room. In repeat programs, the goal is not one-off heroics. It is a controllable framework that a bank can renew and scale.
For transaction structuring, see our Trade Finance
platform workflow.
EPC, Construction, and Performance Obligations
Owners and employers request performance, advance payment, and warranty support. A properly drafted standby reduces disputes by making the call mechanics and expiry logic explicit and aligned with the underlying contract milestones.
Tenders, Permits, and Regulatory Requirements
Some tenders and licensing regimes require bank-backed security. The critical point is beneficiary identity and governing law. Vague beneficiary structures or unfamiliar courts reduce acceptance and can trigger confirmation demands.
Credit Enhancement Inside a Lending Structure
A standby can support a lender’s risk appetite, but it does not replace underwriting. Where collateral is incomplete, the structure can combine receivables controls, inventory oversight, and private credit participation.
Explore Private Credit Financing
for gap solutions.
What Banks Underwrite Before Issuance
Banks do not underwrite vibes. They underwrite repayment capacity, controllability, and compliance. If any of those fail, the pricing increases, the limit shrinks, or the file is declined.
- Applicant credit
including financial statements, cash generation, and leverage profile.
- Transaction logic
including the underlying contract, counterparty strength, and performance timetable.
- Collateral and controls
such as cash cover, pledged deposits, receivables assignment, inventory controls, or other security packages.
- Jurisdiction and enforceability
including governing law, courts, and the beneficiary bank’s policy.
- KYC, AML, and sanctions
covering ownership, directors, counterparties, routes, goods, and payment chain.
Compliance is not a formality.
Expect real screening and real questions on ownership and counterparties.
Drafting That Prevents Re-Issues
Draft quality decides speed. The most common failures are avoidable: mismatched legal names, unclear expiry mechanics, conflicting rule language, and call requirements that cannot be complied with in practice.
- Applicant and beneficiary names
must match corporate records and contract parties.
- Rule set selection
should be explicit (ISP98 or UCP 600 or URDG 758) and not mixed in drafting language.
- Expiry logic
must cover the performance window plus buffer, with clean extension mechanics if needed.
- Governing law and jurisdiction
should be practical for enforcement and confirmation appetite.
- Demand requirements
should be tight and objective, not a free-for-all that scares issuers.
Issuance Workflow and Typical Timeline
A clean workflow reduces back-and-forth and keeps the instrument aligned with the underlying deal timetable. The best results come from a single thread of control: one package, one draft, one issuer process, tracked to a real deadline.
1) Eligibility View
We start with a transaction summary, counterparty profile, and a light KYC view. The aim is to confirm the instrument type, rule set, and whether a credible issuer path exists.
2) Mandate and Data Room
The file moves into a controlled workspace with the contract, draft wording, corporate documents, and financials. Missing items are flagged early so the issuer does not stall mid-cycle.
3) Underwriting and Collateral
The issuer reviews credit and compliance, then confirms collateral and controls. Where collateral is partial, we structure mitigants that banks actually recognize, not fantasies.
4) Draft Finalization and SWIFT
Wording is finalized, fees and commissions are settled per the issuer’s policy, and the MT-760 is transmitted and advised through the beneficiary’s bank.
For reference on message categories, see SWIFT documentation: Guarantee and Standby Message Types.
Cost Drivers and Economics
Pricing is driven by credit risk, jurisdiction, tenor, beneficiary requirements, and whether confirmation is needed. In most mandates, the economics fall into four buckets: issuing bank commission (quoted per annum), fixed issuance and amendment charges, confirmation pricing (if required), and professional costs (legal review or opinion where needed).
Treat any offer of “instant monetization” or “leased SBLC with no credit review” as a stop sign. Real issuance is underwriting plus documentation plus compliance. If a party tries to bypass that, you are being pulled into a structure designed to fail.
If your problem is collateral, the correct fix is structuring, not gimmicks. Depending on the deal, solutions may include receivables controls, inventory supervision, structured trade finance, or private credit gap support.
Start with Structured Trade Finance
and scale from there.
Document Requirements Checklist
An issuer-ready file is boring by design. It contains what compliance and credit teams need to approve, not what sales decks want to show.
- Executed underlying contract (trade, EPC, or tender documentation) that references the required security.
- Corporate registry extracts, ownership chart, director information, and authorized signatory evidence.
- Financials (audited where available) and latest interim management accounts.
- Beneficiary details, bank coordinates, and any beneficiary bank confirmation policy requirements.
- Draft SBLC wording and a summary of call conditions, expiry, and extension mechanics.
- Compliance questionnaire and supporting documents for KYC, AML, and sanctions review.
Common Deal Breakers
- Sanctions exposure in counterparties, routes, goods, or payment chain.
- Beneficiary structures that are unclear, changeable, or not commercially justified.
- Expiry windows that do not cover the real performance period or shipment timeline.
- Draft demands that are overly broad, subjective, or inconsistent with the chosen rule set.
- Applicants seeking an SBLC to support a third party’s borrowing without enforceable repayment controls.
FAQ
Can an MT-760 SBLC be used to raise funding?
Sometimes, but only inside a properly documented structure with a real lender, clear facility terms, and enforceable controls. The SBLC does not replace underwriting. If someone pitches “cash against face value” without recourse and without credit review, treat it as fraud risk.
Is confirmation always required?
No. Confirmation is a second undertaking added by a confirming bank. It is requested when the beneficiary’s bank policy demands it due to issuer rating, country risk, tenor, or governance requirements. If it is not required, it can add cost without improving execution.
What happens if the SBLC is called?
If the demand is compliant, the issuing bank pays. The applicant then owes reimbursement to the bank under the applicant agreement and security documents. That is why call conditions, controls, and underlying deal integrity matter.
How long does issuance take?
Timing depends on KYC readiness, issuer cycle times, draft quality, and collateral. Repeat clients with current KYC and clean drafting can move fast. First-time applicants typically take longer because compliance and credit have to be built from scratch.
Do you work with “leased SBLC” offers or monetization programs?
No. We focus on regulated issuance pathways and lender-grade structures. If a party is selling a shortcut, you should assume you are the exit liquidity.
MT-760 Arrangement Service
Financely runs the process from structuring to execution through regulated counterparties. The engagement focuses on speed and certainty: clean drafting, issuer alignment, credit strategy for limited collateral, and an execution workflow that stays controlled from mandate to SWIFT.
If you need a structure that does not rely on full cash collateral, we bring options that can close the gap, including lender-recognized controls and, where appropriate, private credit participation.
Apply For An MT-760 SBLC Quote
Submit your contract, beneficiary requirements, requested amount and tenor, and your KYC pack. We will revert with an eligibility view and realistic execution options.
Apply For A Quote
Disclaimer: This page is for general information only and does not constitute legal, tax, regulatory, investment, or credit advice. Financely is not a bank and does not issue letters of credit or guarantees. Any SBLC, documentary credit, confirmation, or financing facility is provided solely by regulated counterparties under their own licenses, approvals, documentation, and credit decisions. All mandates are subject to eligibility, full KYC and AML review, sanctions screening, and execution of formal agreements. SBLCs are contingent liabilities and may become a reimbursement obligation if a compliant demand is honored by the issuing bank.