We provide lender-ready capital raise packaging and debt or equity placement support for business owners and buyers looking to secure serious term sheets and close funding on a defined timeline.
For business owners and acquirers pursuing private debt submit your deal for review. We revert within one working day with next steps and either a quote for our services.
Finance your next trade, project or acquisition.
Debt structuring, targeted lender outreach and negotiation support through closing.
Paid advisory. Upfront retainer applies.
Independent sponsors do not usually fail because they cannot find a deal. They fail because the capital stack, the promote, and the governance terms do not survive a sophisticated capital partner's diligence.
This program trains independent sponsors to structure commercial real estate transactions using other people's money, from co-GP economics and waterfall mechanics to JV operating agreements and lender-facing documentation. The language is the language capital partners actually use.
An independent sponsor has no committed fund, so every deal has to be financed from scratch, and every capital partner has to be convinced that the sponsor's economics are earned rather than extracted. That is a structuring problem before it is a sourcing problem. The sponsor who can explain the promote waterfall, the pref, the catch-up, and the sponsor co-invest cleanly gets taken seriously faster than the sponsor with a better property and a vague term sheet.
OPM is not a single pool. It is a stack: senior debt, mezzanine or preferred equity, LP common equity, co-GP capital, and the sponsor's own co-investment. Each layer has a different return expectation, a different security position, and a different set of consent rights. Structuring the deal means deciding who sits where and what each layer is paid to accept its position.
OPM is priced governance, not free capital. Every dollar of someone else's money carries an implied right: information, consent, removal, or priority in the waterfall. A sponsor who treats those rights as paperwork will discover them at the worst possible moment.
The program is organized around the five structuring decisions that determine whether a deal-by-deal CRE transaction closes and survives its hold period.
| Structuring layer | What gets negotiated | Failure mode if handled poorly |
|---|---|---|
| Capital stack | Senior loan sizing, mezz or pref equity, LP common equity, co-GP allocation, sponsor co-invest | A stack that cannot close, or a sponsor with no skin in the deal |
| Promote mechanics | IRR hurdles, equity multiple tests, catch-up, tiered splits, 80/20 vs 70/30, promote clawback | A waterfall the sponsor cannot explain under diligence |
| Fee stack | Acquisition fee, asset management fee, disposition fee, sourcing fee, development fee, construction oversight fee | Fees that look like leakage rather than compensation |
| Governance and JV terms | JV operating agreement, major decision matrix, key person provisions, removal rights, buy-sell, drag and tag | A sponsor with economics but no control |
| Lender interface | Guaranty and completion guaranty, intercreditor terms, DSCR, debt yield, LTV, cash management | A deal that closes but cannot be refinanced or exited |
The curriculum also covers the adjacent terms that show up in real negotiations: preferred return accrual and compounding, promote calculated on total distributions versus net IRR, sponsor co-invest pari passu versus preferred, promote earned deal by deal versus across a programmatic relationship, and the difference between an SPV and a co-GP structure.
Each session follows the sequence of a live independent sponsor transaction, from sourcing through exit.
Source and lock up. The deal is sourced off-market, negotiated with the seller, and secured under an LOI or purchase contract with exclusivity. The structuring implications start here, because the LOI sets the deposit, the diligence period, and the closing certainty the sponsor can promise.
Underwrite and size the debt. The property is underwritten to lender standards: in-place NOI, lease rollover, capex, market rent, exit cap rate, debt yield, DSCR, and LTV. The senior loan is sized before the equity stack is marketed, because the equity requirement is a function of the debt.
Design the capital stack. The sponsor decides whether the gap is filled with mezzanine, preferred equity, LP common, co-GP capital, or a combination. Each option changes the cost of capital, the sponsor's residual promote, and the consent rights the capital partner will demand.
Negotiate the term sheet and JV. The term sheet sets the promote, the fees, the pref, the catch-up, and the major decision matrix. The JV operating agreement then converts those terms into enforceable rights: capital calls, removal, key person, buy-sell, and exit.
Close, operate, and exit. Closing runs through lender conditions precedent, guaranty execution, and intercreditor arrangements. The hold period tests whether the asset management fee, the reporting obligations, and the promote structure were designed for the actual business plan.
The program is built around the documents and models a capital partner will actually review, not around general real estate concepts. Participants work with a promote waterfall model, a sources and uses schedule, a JV term sheet, and a major decision matrix. The exercises are designed to expose the gaps that show up in diligence.
Model-based. The promote is built and stress-tested across IRR hurdles and equity multiples, so the sponsor can see how the waterfall behaves when the exit is later or lower than the base case.
Document-based. The JV operating agreement, the term sheet, and the lender documents are treated as structuring instruments, not legal formalities. Participants learn which clauses carry economic consequences and which are standard.
Negotiation-based. The program covers how capital partners think about sponsor economics, what they push back on, and how to defend a fee stack or a promote tier with reasoning rather than assertion.
| Question | Structuring answer |
|---|---|
| Who funds the deal? | Senior lender, mezz or pref provider, LP equity, co-GP capital, sponsor co-invest |
| Who gets paid first? | Debt service, then preferred return, then catch-up, then promote tiers |
| How does the sponsor earn? | Acquisition and asset management fees during the hold, promote at exit, return on co-invest |
| Who controls decisions? | Major decision matrix, consent rights, removal and key person provisions in the JV |
| How does the deal end? | Refinance or sale, waterfall distribution, promote calculation, buy-sell if a partner exits |
The output of the program is a repeatable structuring process that a sponsor can take to the next deal without rebuilding the analysis from zero. That means a standard capital stack framework, a promote model, a term sheet template, and a JV issues checklist, all calibrated to the sponsor's target deal size and asset class.
It also means the sponsor can hold a conversation with a family office or LP without deferring every economic question to counsel. The point is not to replace lawyers or accountants. The point is to arrive at those conversations with a structure that is already coherent.
An independent sponsor needs to understand the full capital stack, not just the equity cheque. That means senior debt sizing, mezzanine and preferred equity, LP common equity, co-GP capital, and sponsor co-investment, plus how each layer is paid and what consent rights it carries.
The waterfall ranks distributions: return of capital, then a preferred return to the LP, then a catch-up to the sponsor, then a promote split above the hurdle. Common structures include a simple 80/20 split above an 8 percent pref or a tiered IRR waterfall with step-up promotes at higher return thresholds.
A co-GP invests alongside the lead sponsor and shares in GP-level economics, including promote and fees. An LP is a passive capital provider that receives a preferred return and a share of profits but does not participate in GP economics or day-to-day control.
The JV operating agreement converts the term sheet into enforceable rights: capital calls, major decision approvals, removal and key person provisions, buy-sell mechanics, and exit. Terms that look procedural can determine whether the sponsor keeps control or keeps the promote.
Independent sponsors, emerging developers, former private equity or banking professionals moving into deal-by-deal CRE, and operators who can source and run assets but need a repeatable structuring process for other people's money.
This page is for general information only and does not constitute financial, legal, tax or investment advice, or an offer to sell any security. Real estate investment involves risk, including loss of capital. Structures, terms and tax treatment vary by jurisdiction and by transaction. Readers should consult qualified legal, tax and financial professionals before entering into any transaction.