We provide lender-ready capital raise packaging and debt or equity placement support for business owners and buyers looking to secure serious term sheets and close funding on a defined timeline.
For business owners and acquirers pursuing private debt submit your deal for review. We revert within one working day with next steps and either a quote for our services.
Finance your next trade, project or acquisition.
Debt structuring, targeted lender outreach and negotiation support through closing.
Paid advisory. Upfront retainer applies.
A trade transaction rarely stalls because commercial demand is weak. It stalls because the financing request reaches a bank without a verifiable repayment route, documentary control over the goods, or a structure that reflects when cash actually leaves and returns.
A structured trade finance advisor converts a real commercial flow into a credit request a bank or private credit fund can underwrite: contracts, counterparties, collateral controls, payment mechanics, and a defined repayment source, packaged and placed through to closing. This guide explains what the role involves, what gets structured, how a mandate runs, and what to ask before appointing one.
An advisor's core function is translation: taking an operating trade flow, restating it in the language credit committees use, and running the process through to a term sheet. The work covers structuring, documentation, counterparty verification, lender selection, and the diligence coordination that follows. It is not a brokerage role, and it is not a lender. The advisor does not fund the transaction. The advisor makes the transaction fundable and then places it.
The starting point is the trade itself: what is bought, from whom, on what terms, shipped how, sold to whom, and paid when. Everything else follows that sequence. From there, the request gets built backward from repayment. If the exit is a buyer payment 60 days after delivery, the facility tenor, drawdown conditions, and collection mechanics must match that date rather than follow a generic revolver template.
Structured trade finance also means deciding what the lender takes security over: receivables, inventory, goods in transit, assigned contract proceeds, or a combination. A structured trade finance advisor frames each mandate around the actual goods, contracts, and corridor before any institution sees the file.
Introductions are cheap. The file behind the introduction is what changes the outcome. Sending one request to forty institutions produces forty polite declines and can damage the borrower's reputation in a small market. Advisory earns its place when the deal has a fixable defect and the advisor resolves it before submission.
Advisory also coordinates participants that trade credit rarely sources from one place. A single shipment cycle can involve an issuing bank, a confirming bank, a credit insurer, a collateral manager, and a non-bank funder taking the discount risk. Banks handle documentary instruments and corridor exposure. Private credit and specialty trade funds take on structures banks decline because of ticket size, jurisdiction, or SME profile. Insurers absorb buyer non-payment risk that makes the receivable fundable. Matching each participant with the risk it prices well is part of the job.
Structured trade finance is defined less by a single product than by the logic behind it: financing is secured against the transaction and repaid from its proceeds, rather than relying primarily on the borrower's balance sheet. That distinction matters for companies with strong trade flows but limited traditional collateral, and for transactions in markets where conventional bank finance is inaccessible or insufficient.
| Structure | How it works | Typical use |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-export finance | Advances against export contracts, with proceeds assignment and shipment checks | Funding production or aggregation before goods ship |
| Borrowing base revolver | Availability set by eligible inventory and receivables, with periodic redetermination | Working capital that flexes with the trade cycle |
| Inventory or repo | Title transfer against warehouse or tank receipts, with buyback on set terms | Goods held in storage awaiting sale or shipment |
| Receivables discounting | Early payment against invoices, with or without credit insurance | Bridging the gap after delivery and before buyer payment |
| Offtake prepayment | Buyer or financier prepays, secured against future deliveries | Producers needing capital ahead of a committed offtake |
| SBLC and guarantees | Documentary support for performance and payment obligations | Counterparty assurance across the transaction |
Alongside the instrument, the advisor specifies the controls that make it bankable: assignment of proceeds and account control with a waterfall, third-party inspectors and collateral managers at storage and load points, warehouse and tank receipts, tripartite agreements and release rules, quality and weight reconciliation by shipment, hedging links for price risk where relevant, and KYC and sanctions screening on counterparties.
Typical parameters give a sense of the market. Facility sizes commonly run from USD 5 million into the hundreds of millions with syndication. Transactional tenors sit around 30 to 180 days, with revolving facilities up to two years subject to clean-down tests. Advance rates on receivables can reach 80 to 90 percent when insured, while inventory advances sit at 60 to 80 percent depending on grade, location, and liquidity. Those are illustrations, not commitments. Weak storage, messy documents, or unclear buyer credit push advance rates down and timelines out.
A full-scope mandate moves through identifiable stages, and each one produces something the next stage depends on. Skipping a stage does not save time. It moves the problem to a lender's credit committee, where it costs more.
Transaction review and bankability. The advisor reviews the commodity, counterparties, contracts, logistics, economics, and the financing gap. The first question is whether there is a genuine commercial trade, whether the requested amount matches the working capital requirement, and whether the proposed structure has a credible repayment path.
Structuring and the credit package. The advisor determines whether the transaction fits prepayment, borrowing base, inventory, receivables, LC-backed, or another structure, then prepares the lender-facing transaction summary, financial analysis, sources and uses, and supporting documentation. This is also where the trading map, collateral audit, eligibility rules, and advance rate model get built.
Capital placement and term sheets. Outreach is matched to ticket size, geography, tenor, and collateral profile. The advisor approaches appropriate banks, private credit funds, and specialty commodity finance providers, then compares advance rates, pricing, tenor, security, covenants, and transaction controls across the term sheets received.
Due diligence and closing. Lender information requests, KYT, contracts, logistics documentation, and financial diligence all have to be coordinated, often against a live trade with a target closing date. The mandate then runs through final approvals, conditions precedent, and financing documentation, with support on account opening, proceeds assignment, funds flow, and first borrowing base.
General financial consulting expertise does not translate automatically to trade finance. Trade credit is underwritten against goods, documents, and counterparty performance, and the exception patterns differ by commodity, corridor, and instrument. A specialist should be able to name the sectors, corridors, and ticket sizes where they have actually closed transactions, not just advised on them.
Instrument-level familiarity. A credible advisor can discuss LC, SBLC, bank guarantees, and documentary collections at the level of drafting and execution, not just mention them as a service line. Instrument selection and wording protect the borrower's commercial position at every stage, and errors there surface months later as unpaid or unenforceable claims.
Lender relationships with real breadth. The relevant network spans banks, funds, DFIs, insurers, and collateral managers. Depth matters more than a long list. An advisor who knows which institution prices a given corridor and collateral profile well will place a file faster than one running a broad, unfocused process.
Execution discipline after the first call. Lender questions, diligence lists, term sheet comparisons, conditions precedent, and document tracking can consume weeks of management time. The difference between an advisor who adds value and one who does not usually shows up here, after the introduction has already been made.
Professional trade finance mandates commonly combine an advisory retainer with a transaction-based fee. The retainer funds the work that happens before any lender commits: transaction review, structuring, lender preparation, documentation support, and execution resources. The success fee is paid at signing or first draw and reflects the capital actually arranged.
Published market ranges put non-refundable retainers in the region of USD 40,000 to 60,000 for commodity transactions, with success fees commonly in the 2.5 to 3.5 percent range on funded amounts, and some structuring-only engagements priced as a flat fee. These figures vary by ticket size, complexity, and jurisdiction. Third-party costs such as KYC, inspections, insurance, legal fees, and bank charges sit outside the advisory fee.
Fee structure should be read as a signal. An advisor who cannot explain what the retainer pays for, or who offers to work only on success, is usually either not committing resources to the transaction or pricing the risk elsewhere. A clear scope, a defined workplan, and a written fee schedule are baseline expectations.
The right questions separate firms that can execute from firms that can describe execution. Ask them before signing, and ask for specifics rather than adjectives.
Which transactions in my commodity and corridor have you closed in the last 24 months? Request case examples with ticket size, structure, and outcome. Sector experience that is adjacent rather than direct is worth less than it appears.
Which institutions did you place those transactions with, and who did you deal with there? A genuine lender network is specific. Vague references to relationships across the market are not verifiable and usually are not deep.
What is your view on the fixable defects in my file? A specialist will identify weaknesses in the storage arrangements, Incoterms, counterparty history, or margin story early. A generalist will ask for documents and promise to review them.
What does the retainer cover, what is excluded, and what triggers the success fee? Get the scope in writing, including how many lender approaches are included and what happens if the mandate is terminated.
Who does the work? Ask whether the principal who pitches the mandate is the person running it. In boutique advisory, that is often the selling point. Confirm it rather than assume it.
A structured trade finance mandate is a sequence of dependent decisions, and each one narrows what the next can be.
| Stage | What gets decided | Failure if skipped |
|---|---|---|
| Transaction review | Whether a genuine trade exists and what the real financing gap is | A facility sized to a request rather than to the trade |
| Collateral and control mapping | What the lender secures and how it monitors release of goods | Advance rates cut or the structure declined outright |
| Lender matching | Which institutions price this ticket, corridor, and collateral well | Weeks lost on institutions that never had appetite |
| Term sheet comparison | Trade-offs between pricing, tenor, security, and covenants | Accepting the first offer rather than the right one |
| Diligence and closing | Conditions precedent, documentation, and funds flow | A trade that closes late or not at all |
The best structured trade finance advisor for a given transaction is the one whose sector, corridor, and ticket size experience matches the file in front of them, and whose process is explicit enough to audit before a mandate is signed. Coverage claims, transaction ranges, and sector lists are marketing. Case evidence, lender specificity, fee transparency, and a clear view of the defects in your own deal are what predict whether a facility reaches closing.
For borrowers with a live trade, the practical next step is a structured review of the flows, contracts, storage arrangements, and repayment source, followed by a workplan that states what has to be fixed before any lender sees the file.
An advisor translates an operating trade flow into a credit request a bank or private credit fund can underwrite. The work covers structuring, documentation, counterparty verification, lender selection, and the diligence coordination that follows. The advisor does not lend. They make the transaction fundable and place it with appropriate institutions.
Conventional lending assesses the borrower's creditworthiness and balance sheet. Structured trade finance focuses on the cash flow generated by the underlying goods or assets in the transaction. The financing is secured against the transaction and repaid from its proceeds, which makes it useful for businesses with strong trade flows but limited traditional collateral.
Common structures include pre-export finance, borrowing base revolvers, inventory or repo financing, receivables discounting, offtake prepayments, and SBLC and guarantee programmes. Alongside the instrument, the advisor specifies controls such as proceeds assignment, third-party inspections, warehouse receipts, release rules, and hedging where relevant.
Most mandates combine a non-refundable advisory retainer with a success fee paid at signing or first draw. Published market ranges put retainers around USD 40,000 to 60,000 for commodity transactions, with success fees commonly in the 2.5 to 3.5 percent range on funded amounts. Third-party costs such as KYC, inspections, insurance, and legal fees are separate.
Timelines depend on the complexity of the transaction and the state of the file. A focused process can move from intake and structuring to term sheet within weeks, with documentation, conditions precedent, and funding following once a lender has completed diligence. Defects in storage arrangements, documentation, or counterparty history are the most common cause of delay.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute financial, legal, tax or investment advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any product. Facility sizes, advance rates, fees and timelines quoted are illustrative market ranges and not commitments. Terms are set by lenders after diligence and credit approval. Readers should review the relevant agreements and consult a qualified professional before making decisions about their own transaction.