We provide lender-ready capital raise packaging and debt or equity placement support for business owners and buyers looking to secure serious term sheets and close funding on a defined timeline.
For business owners and acquirers pursuing private debt submit your deal for review. We revert within one working day with next steps and either a quote for our services.
Finance your next trade, project or acquisition.
Debt structuring, targeted lender outreach and negotiation support through closing.
Paid advisory. Upfront retainer applies.
AI Lender Match helps business owners, investors, and sponsors identify lenders that fit their deal profile without wasting weeks on cold outreach. Get a smarter starting point for acquisitions, commercial real estate, trade finance, and structured debt transactions.
An SBLC deed of agreement, usually shortened to DOA, is a document that offers to lease or sell you a standby letter of credit from a household-name bank for a small percentage of its face value. Lease a USD 100 million SBLC for 3%, "monetize" it at 80% loan to value, and fund your project with someone else's balance sheet. It reads like an infinite money glitch because that is exactly what it pretends to be.
It is not a financing route. It is a template, copied and recirculated for years by brokers who have never seen a standby issued, and by people who know precisely what they are doing. We read the DOAs that circulate publicly and took them apart line by line. None of them describe a transaction that can exist, and none of them will ever close.
In this article
The pitch is always the same. A "provider" or "lessor" controls bank instruments, usually described as fresh cut or seasoned, and will deliver an SBLC or bank guarantee by MT760 to a "receiver" in exchange for a lease fee or a purchase price. The receiver then takes the instrument to a monetizer, a private placement programme or a project lender, and turns it into cash. Commissions are split across a daisy chain of intermediaries, each adding half a percent.
The whole thing rests on a lie. There is no seller sitting on a stock of bank instruments, and there is no buyer ready to turn them into cash. Every broker in the chain is forwarding a document that someone else forwarded to them, each convinced the real provider is one introduction away. They never are, because the provider does not exist.
The publicly available templates we reviewed share the same skeleton. Face values run from EUR 1 million to EUR 5 billion, sometimes written literally as "XX Billion Euro" because nobody filled in the blank. Lease fees range from 1.5% to 3.5% of face value. Purchase prices sit around 42% plus 2% commission. Issuing banks are listed as a rotating roster of London, Frankfurt, Hong Kong and New York names, none of which have any connection to the paper. The term is invariably "one year and one day".
Below is a composite of the clauses that recur across circulating DOAs, paraphrased from the templates we reviewed. Each numbered marker points to a problem that alone is enough to kill the deal.
DEED OF AGREEMENT: LEASE / PURCHASE OF BANK INSTRUMENT
Instrument Standby Letter of Credit (SBLC) or Bank Guarantee 1
Face value EUR XX,000,000,000, in tranches of EUR XX,000,000 2
Issuing bank Top 25 world bank, to be confirmed 3
Age and term Fresh cut, one year and one day, rolls and extensions available 4
Price Lease 3% + 0.5% commission, or purchase 42% + 2% of face value 5
Delivery MT799 pre-advice, then MT760 from provider's bank to receiver's bank 6
Transmission fee EUR 25,000 to EUR 120,000, payable by receiver before issuance 7
Confidentiality Any unauthorised call to the banks terminates this agreement 8
Default If unpaid, provider will instruct the issuing bank to claim on the instrument 9
Signed under penalty of perjury, ready, willing and able
Strip away the jargon and ask the questions any credit officer would ask in the first five minutes. The DOA fails every one.
A standby letter of credit is governed by rules such as the International Standby Practices (ISP98) or URDG 758. It is the issuing bank's irrevocable undertaking to pay a named beneficiary against a compliant demand. The applicant must reimburse the bank on any draw. There is no mechanism by which a third party "rents" that undertaking for a year and hands it back.
Whoever stands behind the instrument is liable for the full face value if it is drawn. Under a DOA, that person posts or encumbers USD 100 million so that a stranger can borrow against it, and earns USD 3 million for the privilege. Why would anyone with USD 100 million of capacity guarantee an unknown counterparty's debt on those terms?
If you held an irrevocable claim on a tier-one bank for EUR 100 million, would you sell it for EUR 42 million? A real claim on a strong bank trades close to face value less a modest discount for time. A 58% discount on top-rated bank risk does not exist in any market.
A lender only advances cash against a standby because it can draw on it if the borrower fails to repay. That draw lands on the "lessor". So the lessor is, in substance, lending the full amount to the lessee for a one-off 3% fee with no credit work, no security and no recourse. That is not a business. It is a contradiction.
DOAs threaten that if the lease fee is not paid, the provider will have the issuing bank "claim" on the instrument. The applicant has no right to draw. Only the beneficiary does, and the bank pays the beneficiary, not the applicant. Whoever drafted this clause does not know who owes what to whom in a standby.
Every legitimate beneficiary verifies an incoming guarantee through its own bank, and every issuer expects that call. A contract that terminates the deal if you contact the bank exists to stop you discovering that the instrument, the provider or the account does not exist.
"One year and one day", "ready, willing and able", "under penalty of perjury", notarised refund undertakings with 1% penalties, fee tables with missing tiers and unexplained percentages. These documents are copied from one another, which is why the same typos and blank fields appear across uploads years apart.
If a provider can deliver tier-one bank paper for 3% of face, why is it sold through a chain of unnamed intermediaries on messaging apps instead of to the hedge funds and banks that would pay many times more for it the same afternoon?
Every DOA pitch rests on a loop in which money appears from nowhere. Follow it once and the missing link is obvious.
The monetizer only lends because it can draw on the SBLC. When it draws, the party behind the instrument pays the full face value. No one in this loop would agree to stand in that position for a 3% fee.
Ask yourself before you sign anything
Why would a bank issue a USD 100 million undertaking for someone it has never onboarded?
Why would anyone sell a claim on a tier-one bank for less than half its value?
Why does the deal collapse the moment you try to verify it with the issuer?
Has anyone in the chain ever met the provider, or seen a single one of these deals fund?
And if the instrument is so easy to monetize, why has nobody in the chain ever done it themselves?
| What the DOA says | How standbys actually work |
|---|---|
| SBLCs can be leased or bought from a provider | A bank issues a standby at the request of its own client, the applicant, in favour of a specific beneficiary, for a defined underlying obligation. There is no secondary rental market. |
| Fresh cut or seasoned instruments available | Not banking terms. A standby is created for the transaction it supports, with the expiry and amount that obligation requires. |
| MT799 pre-advice confirms the deal | An MT799 is a free-format message with no binding effect. The issuing bank sends the MT760 to the beneficiary's advising bank after it has approved the applicant's credit or cash collateral. |
| Lease for 1.5% to 3.5% of face value | Banks price standbys for their own clients as an annual fee against a credit line or cash collateral, because the bank and its client carry the full payment risk. |
| Monetize at 70% to 90% LTV | A lender advances against a standby only where it is the beneficiary of an instrument tied to its own loan. It will not lend against a "leased" instrument it cannot enforce. |
| Do not contact the issuing bank | Authentication through the beneficiary's bank and the issuer is standard practice and expected by every legitimate issuer. |
This is not a grey area. The US Securities and Exchange Commission has long warned that so-called "prime bank" instruments and trading programmes are fraudulent, and the leased SBLC, monetization and private placement chain is the same story in different packaging. If a deal depends on a DOA, the right move is to walk away. Not negotiate the fee, not ask for a better provider, not wait for the next "tranche". Walk away.
It starts with a real obligation. A supplier needs payment security, a lender needs credit support for a facility, or a contract requires a performance guarantee. The standby exists because that obligation exists, and its amount and expiry match it.
The applicant is the bank's own client. The issuing bank onboards the applicant, assesses its credit or takes cash collateral, and accepts the reimbursement risk. Nobody outside that relationship can "provide" the instrument.
The beneficiary is named and verifies. The instrument goes from the issuing bank to the beneficiary's bank, which authenticates it. The beneficiary can draw only against a compliant demand under the stated rules.
The economics make sense to everyone. The bank earns a fee proportional to the risk it carries for a client it knows. No one is asked to underwrite a stranger for a one-off percentage.
If your project genuinely needs credit support, the work is in building a credit case strong enough for a bank or an insurer to stand behind. That is what our credit enhancement advisory covers, and why our fixed-fee Lender-Ready Package starts with the credit memo, model and KYC file rather than with an instrument. For trade flows, our guide to physical commodity trading and its financing structures shows how lenders actually secure their exposure.
Financely does not review, broker or verify DOAs, leased instruments or monetization offers. We structure bankable transactions and present them to lenders from a network of more than 12,700 verified capital providers.
If you have a genuine project, trade or acquisition, send us the details and we will come back with a scope, fee and timeline.
It is a template contract offering to lease or sell a standby letter of credit or bank guarantee for a percentage of face value, usually followed by "monetization". It does not describe any transaction a bank would participate in, and deals built on it do not close.
No. A standby is a bank's undertaking to a named beneficiary for a specific obligation, backed by the applicant's credit or collateral. It cannot be rented to an unrelated party, and no lender will advance funds against an instrument it cannot enforce.
An MT799 is a free-format SWIFT message with no binding effect. An MT760 is the message an issuing bank uses to issue a guarantee or standby to the beneficiary's bank. A "provider" outside the issuing bank cannot send either on a bank's behalf.
By applying to their own bank, which issues the standby against the company's credit line or cash collateral in favour of a named beneficiary for a real underlying obligation. Where credit is thin, the route is a stronger credit case, collateral or insurance support, not a third-party instrument.
This article is general information only and does not constitute legal, tax or investment advice. It describes the content of document templates that circulate publicly and does not refer to any specific individual or company. Financely is an advisory and arranging firm, not a lender, bank or broker-dealer. Any financing is subject to lender underwriting, due diligence, credit approval, documentation and conditions precedent, and no outcome or timeline is guaranteed.
Submit your deal using our secure intake form, and receive a quote within 1-3 business days. Existing clients can connect with their relationship manager through our secure web portal.
All submissions are
promptly reviewed, and all communications are conducted through the intake form or the client portal for a seamless and secure process.
Thank you for considering working with us. A nominal fee of US$500 is required upon completion of each form. This fee covers the time and effort we invest in reviewing your submission and crafting a thorough proposal. We receive numerous inquiries and prioritize those that carry this fee, ensuring serious applicants receive prompt attention.
Tap into solutions like letters of credit, bank guarantees, and payment facilitation. We address the challenge of global transaction risk through structured strategies that foster cross-border growth. Complete the form to unlock streamlined funding aligned with your commercial objectives.
Submit a RequestAccess non-recourse funding for infrastructure, renewable energy, or other capital-intensive ventures. We mitigate capital constraints by isolating project assets and focusing on risk management. Provide your details to receive a structure that drives growth and maximizes returns.
Submit a RequestSecure financing for business or real estate acquisitions. We ease transaction hurdles by reviewing cash flow, synergy opportunities, and exit plans. Complete the form for a customized proposal that supports your strategic investment objectives.
Submit a RequestFinancely assists banks facing Basel III pressures by distributing trade finance deals and providing collateral for letters of credit. We reduce capital burdens while preserving client relationships and fostering service expansion. Submit your request to optimize your trade finance offerings.
Submit a RequestOnce we receive your submission, our team will review your information to determine feasibility. If eligible, you will receive a proposal or term sheet within 1–3 business days. Visit our FAQ and Procedure pages for more information.
Disclaimer: Financely provides financing based on due diligence and feasibility. Approval is not guaranteed, and past performance does not predict future outcomes. All terms are subject to review. Financely primarily assists with structuring and distribution. Qualified parties carry out the project if the client approves the proposal.