Back-to-Back Commodity Trade Case Study: How Two Letters of Credit Move One Cargo

Find The Right Lender Faster. Access 12,000+ Lenders.

AI Lender Match helps business owners, investors, and sponsors identify lenders that fit their deal profile without wasting weeks on cold outreach. Get a smarter starting point for acquisitions, commercial real estate, trade finance, and structured debt transactions.

Back-to-Back Commodity Trade Case Study: How Two Letters of Credit Move One Cargo

Container ship and port cranes handling bulk commodity cargo

A walk-through case study of a gasoil cargo traded through an intermediary, showing exactly where the master LC, the back-to-back LC and the shipping documents sit in the chain.

Back-to-back commodity trades are common in oil, metals and agriculture, where an intermediary buys from a producer and sells to an end buyer without ever taking physical possession of the cargo. The intermediary is exposed on both sides at once, and that exposure is managed with two linked letters of credit. The master LC protects the sale to the end buyer. The back-to-back LC protects the purchase from the supplier, and it is issued against the security of the master LC[reference:0]. The case below follows one cargo through that structure.

The transaction flow

The two LCs run in parallel, not in sequence. The back-to-back LC is issued only because the master LC exists and is held as security[reference:1].

Case study walk-through

A trader agrees to buy 30,000 metric tonnes of gasoil from a refiner and sell the same cargo to an end buyer in another market. The trader never intends to store or handle the product. The cargo will move directly from the refiner's terminal to the end buyer's discharge port, and the trader's margin sits between the two contracts.

The end buyer opens a master LC through its bank in favour of the trader. That LC is irrevocable and payable against a specific document set: a bill of lading, a certificate of origin, a quality certificate and a commercial invoice. The trader now has a bank payment undertaking, but it still has to pay the refiner. It approaches its own bank and asks for a back-to-back LC to be issued to the refiner, using the master LC as collateral[reference:2]. The back-to-back LC mirrors the master LC's key terms: quantity, shipment window, expiry and document requirements. The mirroring matters because a document that satisfies the supplier's LC must also be capable of satisfying the master LC[reference:3].

The refiner ships the cargo and presents documents to its bank. That bank checks the documents against the back-to-back LC and pays the refiner. The documents then travel to the trader's bank, which checks them against the master LC and releases payment to the trader's account, net of the amount owed under the back-to-back LC and the bank's charges[reference:4]. The trader's bank forwards the documents to the end buyer's bank, which pays under the master LC. The end buyer ultimately receives the cargo and the documents, and the trader keeps the difference between the two LC values.

In practice the document flow is not always clean. In string trades, the original bill of lading may not reach every party in time, and letters of indemnity are often used to bridge the gap so payment can be released before the endorsed bill arrives[reference:5]. That does not change the economics of the back-to-back structure, but it does add a layer of legal risk that the trader's bank will price into the facility.

Advisory

Structuring a back-to-back commodity trade?

We help traders and borrowers review LC terms, collateral arrangements and the fee stages behind a back-to-back facility before the first document is presented.

Request a quote

Document and payment map

Stage Who acts What moves What triggers payment
Contract Trader, supplier and end buyer Back-to-back sale and purchase contracts Signed contracts and agreed LC terms
Master LC End buyer's bank Irrevocable LC to the trader Conforming documents under the master LC
Back-to-back LC Trader's bank LC to the supplier, secured by the master LC Conforming documents under the back-to-back LC
Shipment Supplier Cargo and shipping documents Bill of lading and certificate set presented
Supplier payment Supplier's bank and trader's bank Payment under the back-to-back LC Documents checked and accepted
Trader settlement Trader's bank and end buyer's bank Payment under the master LC, net of back-to-back exposure Documents re-presented and accepted

Where the structure can break

  • Document mismatch. The back-to-back LC must mirror the master LC closely enough that the same documents can satisfy both. A discrepancy in one LC can stall payment in the other.
  • Supplier performance. If the supplier ships late or ships the wrong specification, the trader still owes its bank under the back-to-back LC while the master LC may not be drawable.
  • Buyer credit and bank risk. The master LC is only as good as the issuing bank. The trader's bank will assess that bank before accepting the master LC as collateral.
  • Bill of lading timing. In fast-moving string trades, the original bill may not arrive before payment is due, which is why letters of indemnity appear and why courts have had to interpret what those letters actually warrant[reference:6].
  • Insolvency in the chain. If a party between the supplier and the end buyer fails, the back-to-back structure can leave the trader exposed on one side while the other side is frozen[reference:7].

The structure works because the master LC and the back-to-back LC are matched, not because the trader is trusted to pay both sides out of its own funds.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a master LC and a back-to-back LC?

The master LC is issued by the end buyer's bank in favour of the trader. The back-to-back LC is issued by the trader's bank in favour of the supplier, using the master LC as collateral[reference:8]. The two LCs cover the same cargo but sit at different points in the chain.

Does the trader need to put up cash for a back-to-back LC?

Not always. The master LC acts as security, but the trader's bank will still assess the credit quality of the master LC's issuing bank, the trader's margin and any cash margin requirement. Some facilities require a cash deposit or a lien over the documents.

Can the supplier see the end buyer's identity?

Often no. One purpose of the back-to-back structure is to keep the buyer and supplier separated so the trader's margin and relationships are protected. The back-to-back LC is issued in the trader's name, not the end buyer's[reference:9].

This case study is illustrative and does not describe a specific transaction. Back-to-back LC terms, collateral requirements and documentary conditions vary by bank, jurisdiction and commodity. Confirm all LC wording, document requirements and fee arrangements with the issuing banks and qualified trade finance counsel before relying on any structure described here.

Before you submit

Your deal, assessed by people who close

Your financing request goes straight to the principal. You receive a written diagnosis, the proposed structure and a one-off retainer before any work starts.

Recent mandates include a USD 150m revolving credit facility and a USD 12m acquisition closed in 21 days. We are an advisory and arranging firm, not a lender, and you close directly with the lender.

  • Principal-led
  • Fees in writing
  • KYC and AML first
  • Structured Debt
  • Trade Finance
  • Project Finance
  • Acquisitions
Request a Quote
Overhead view of stacked cargo containers and a gantry crane at a port terminal

Financely is an advisory and arranging firm, not a lender or broker-dealer. All financing is subject to KYC, AML, due diligence and lender credit approval. No outcome or timeline is guaranteed.

Still Have Questions? Send Us Your Deal

If you still have questions after visiting our FAQ and Procedure pages, we invite you to book a paid consultation for personalized guidance. A $250 USD fee applies per session.