POF, MT199, MT799, BCL, LC And SBLC Issuance

 Get beneficiary-ready POF and bank instruments issued through regulated partners, with verified delivery, clear timelines, and pricing that matches your counterparty’s checklist.

Read Article

POF, MT199, MT799, BCL, LC And SBLC Issuance

When a seller, beneficiary, or counsel asks for proof of funds, bank-to-bank messaging, or a trade instrument that matches their checklist, the real work is not “getting a document.” The work is getting the correct format, issued by an acceptable bank, with compliant wording, and a clean verification path.

Financely supports clients seeking POF (MT199, MT799, BCL), Documentary Letters of Credit (DLC), usance structures (UPAS and UPAU), and SBLC issuance through regulated partners, subject to diligence and approvals.

Start With A USD 500 RFQ Underwriting Review. If your file qualifies, we revert with the issuing path, a document checklist, indicative timing, and pricing aligned to your beneficiary requirements.

What We Arrange

Proof Of Funds

Used to evidence capacity for a live transaction, usually as MT199, MT799, or a Bank Comfort Letter (BCL), depending on what the recipient will accept and how they will verify.

  • MT199: bank-to-bank free format message used for confirmations and statements.
  • MT799: bank-to-bank free format message often used for pre-advice and assurances.
  • BCL: bank letter format used where SWIFT is not required.

LC, DLC, UPAS, UPAU, SBLC

Used to support settlement, performance, or credit enhancement where obligations, documents, and triggers are defined.

  • DLC: documentary draws against contract and shipping documents.
  • UPAS and UPAU: usance structures used to manage payment terms and liquidity, case-specific.
  • SBLC: standby support for defined obligations and beneficiary draw conditions.
Instrument Typical Purpose Indicative Timing
POF (MT199, MT799, BCL) Capacity evidence and bank-to-bank assurance for a live commercial transaction. Often 3 to 10 working days after complete inputs and compliance clearance.
DLC / LC (Including UPAS and UPAU) Settlement support and documentary draw mechanics under the agreed ruleset and checklist. Often 2 to 4+ weeks depending on KYC depth, wording, and approvals.
SBLC Performance or payment assurance for a defined obligation with clear draw conditions. Often 2 to 4+ weeks depending on margin path, wording, and beneficiary acceptance.

Issuing Banks We Work With

Issuer selection depends on where liquidity sits, the recipient’s acceptability list, jurisdiction, tenor, and the compliance outcome. Typical issuing and confirming partners used in routine mandates include:

Region Examples
North America JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citibank
Europe HSBC, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank
Africa Standard Bank, FirstRand (Rand Merchant Bank), Ecobank
Asia DBS, MUFG, ICBC

The issuer is confirmed after underwriting and compliance screening, and based on beneficiary acceptance and the delivery method required.

Underwriting Cost And Annual Premiums

Most confusion in this market comes from vague pricing. We keep it plain. There is a screening step, then instrument pricing, then bank charges that are annualised when the instrument is outstanding.

Cost Item Applies To Indicative Range
RFQ Underwriting Review All requests USD 500 per RFQ
POF Issuance Fee MT199, MT799, BCL Typically starts around USD 10,000 and scales with complexity and verification requirements
Advisory Retainer LC, DLC, UPAS, UPAU, SBLC LC or DLC often USD 40,000 to 100,000. SBLC commonly from USD 59,500, case-specific
Issuing Bank Commission LC, DLC, SBLC Often ~0.70% to ~1.20% per annum for LCs, and ~0.80% to ~2.50% per annum for SBLCs, typically pro-rated to tenor
Confirmation Pricing Where confirmation is required Often ~0.25% to ~0.55% per annum for LC confirmation, and ~0.50% to ~3.00% per annum for SBLC confirmation, subject to jurisdiction and beneficiary risk policy

All figures are indicative. Final pricing depends on jurisdiction, tenor, ruleset, beneficiary wording, collateral or margin requirements, and issuer policy.

Issuance Procedure

Step-By-Step

  • RFQ intake: instrument type, amount, tenor, beneficiary country, and recipient checklist.
  • Compliance intake: KYC, AML, and sanctions screening for the applicant and relevant parties.
  • Underwriting: structure selection, ruleset alignment, and wording coordination.
  • Issuer allocation: bank selection, internal approvals, and delivery method confirmed.
  • Issuance: delivered via SWIFT or bank letterhead, with verification routed bank-to-bank where applicable.

What Usually Slows Files Down

  • Missing or inconsistent KYC information.
  • Recipient checklist changes late in the process.
  • Unclear commercial purpose or weak document trail.
  • Beneficiary asking for formats that do not match bank policy.

Fastest Way To Get A Clean Quote:

'Send: (1) instrument type, (2) amount and tenor, (3) beneficiary country and acceptability list, (4) the recipient’s wording or checklist, (5) your transaction documents, and (6) a complete KYC pack for the applicant.'

What To Send For A Fast Answer

  • Recipient checklist and verification requirements (SWIFT, letter format, or both).
  • Your draft verbiage, if you already have it, or the beneficiary’s required wording.
  • Core transaction documents: contract, pro forma invoice, term sheet, or equivalent.
  • Applicant KYC pack: corporate docs, ownership, directors, and source of funds narrative as required.
  • Beneficiary details and any acceptability constraints.

Request A Quote

If you have a live counterparty request, submit your RFQ. We will revert with feasibility, pricing, timing, and the issuance path through regulated partners.

Request A Quote

FAQ

Do you provide a “standard template” upfront?

There is no single draft that fits every transaction and every beneficiary checklist. We align wording to the recipient requirements after underwriting, then coordinate adjustments with the issuer.

Can you guarantee beneficiary acceptance of the issuer?

No. We reduce avoidable friction by aligning to the acceptability list and verification method, but acceptance remains the beneficiary’s decision.

Is MT799 always required for proof of funds?

No. Some recipients accept MT199 or a bank letter format. The right choice depends on what the recipient can verify and what their counsel will sign off.

Do UPAS and UPAU apply to every LC?

No. They are structures used in specific situations where payment terms and liquidity mechanics matter. We confirm fit during underwriting.

What is the first step?

Submit the RFQ with the recipient checklist and your transaction documents. If it is bankable, we will revert with the issuing path and the full input list.

Disclaimer: This page is for general information only and does not constitute legal, tax, investment, or regulatory advice. Financely is not a bank or lender and does not issue MT199, MT799, BCLs, LCs, DLCs, UPAS, UPAU, or SBLCs. Any issuance is provided by regulated counterparties under their own licences, approvals, and documentation, and is subject to eligibility, KYC and AML checks, sanctions screening, underwriting, committee approvals, and executed documentation. References to banks are illustrative and do not imply availability for any specific applicant or transaction.