Global Trade Finance Platform for Lenders & Borrowers

We connect qualified importers, exporters, commodity traders, and project sponsors with banks, trade finance funds, and credit insurers that actively deploy capital into cross border working capital.

Core Use Cases

  • Import and export LCs, SBLCs, and demand guarantees for physical goods
  • Pre-shipment and post-shipment finance secured on inventory and receivables
  • Borrowing base and receivables purchase programs for repeat trade flows
  • Commodity and industrial trade linked to infrastructure, energy, and manufacturing

The platform focuses on transactions from USD 1 million to USD 250 million, across letters of credit, SBLCs and guarantees, structured receivables, and pre-export or pre-shipment finance. Borrowers submit a defined trade flow, counterparties, and documents.

The platform standardizes that information, screens it against policy criteria, and routes it to capital providers with a real mandate to issue facilities.


The objective is simple: borrowers see what is financeable and at what pricing; lenders and funds see structured files instead of random inbound requests.

Data, Structure, And Governance

The trade finance gap has moved from roughly USD 1.7 trillion at the start of the decade to around USD 2.5 trillion today. The shortfall is concentrated in emerging markets and in the SME and mid-market segment, where rejection rates remain high.


At the same time, large banks, DFIs, and private credit funds are announcing new trade programs, risk-sharing arrangements, and unfunded guarantee lines. There is capital, but it is selective and policy-driven. The platform is built around how credit committees and investment committees actually work.

Learn More

120+

Lenders

35+ 

Countries

US$2.3B+

Sourced & Facilitated

How The Platform Works

From raw documents to policy-ready credit files. Less time on dead deals, more time on transactions that can sign.

Structured Data, Not Scattered PDFs

Each transaction sits in a single template that credit officers can read in minutes. Counterparties, goods, Incoterms, trade cycle, payment terms, and instruments are laid out in a consistent format instead of buried across emails and attachments.

  • Standard fields for buyer, seller, goods, routes, Incoterms, and payment flows.
  • Collateral captured in concrete terms: warehouse stock, receivables, guarantees, cash margins, or security over assets.
  • Supporting documents filed behind a concise front sheet instead of loose PDFs.

Outcome: a clear, bank-grade snapshot of the trade that can move straight into internal review instead of being reassembled by the lender.

Policy-Aware Matching

Capital providers define their appetite in detail. Files that do not meet those rules are filtered out before they ever land on a desk, so time is reserved for transactions that can reach mandate stage.

  • Appetite maps by region, country, sector, tenor, instrument type, and ticket size.
  • Hard filters for sanctions, ESG, counterparty type, and documentation standards.
  • Only transactions inside those parameters are routed to the lender or fund.

Outcome: lenders see policy-fit deal flow, and borrowers are not pushed toward capital sources that were never going to approve their profile.

Governance And Role Clarity

The platform acts as arranger and packaging layer. Risk decisions remain with bank risk committees and fund investment committees. Roles, economics, and conflicts are handled in the open.

  • Clear separation between originator, arranger, and lender on each transaction.
  • Engagement terms and fee structures documented and visible to all parties.
  • Conflicts flagged and managed so stakeholders know who leads the client relationship.

Outcome: a clean governance chain that supports credit approval instead of raising questions around who is doing what and who gets paid.

Feedback Loop That Raises Quality

Declines are tracked with specific reasons. That data feeds back into screening rules and borrower guidance, so the overall quality of files improves over time.

  • Reasons logged by theme: tenor, country risk, buyer profile, margin profile, documentation gaps.
  • Screening criteria updated so similar weak files are filtered earlier in the process.
  • Borrowers receive concrete feedback on what must change to move toward approval.

Outcome: fewer dead-on-arrival submissions, higher first-review pass rates, and more time spent on deals that can move from indicative terms to signed facilities.

For Importers, Exporters, and Trading Companies

Eligible transactions typically fall between USD 1 million and USD 250 million, with tenors from 90 days up to 3 years for revolving programs. To start, you provide:


  • Trade flow details: supplier, buyer, goods, incoterms, pricing, and payment terms
  • Contracts, invoices or pro formas, and logistics arrangements
  • Corporate and shareholder KYC for each relevant entity
  • Information on collateral, whether inventory, receivables, guarantees, or cash margins


We review structure, jurisdictional risk, and security, then present the file to selected banks, funds, or credit insurers whose mandate covers the region, sector, and instrument type. You receive either an indicative structure and pricing corridor that can develop into a term sheet, or a reasoned decline that spells out the obstacles.

Apply for Trade Finance

For Banks, Trade Finance Funds, and Credit Insurers

You define your appetite with precision:


  • Supported regions and countries
  • Sectors and product types you will finance
  • Instruments you are prepared to issue: LC, SBLC, guarantees, forfaiting, receivables purchase, borrowing base lines
  • Minimum and maximum ticket sizes and typical tenors
  • Standards for collateral, documentation, sanctions, and ESG



You then receive curated deal files that meet those parameters, with full data rooms opened once your team signals interest. Your pipeline reflects transactions you are willing to underwrite instead of a long list of unfiltered requests.

Join As A Capital Provider

Why Does The Trade Finance Gap Exist?

Global trade in goods and services sits in the low-thirty-trillion-dollar range each year. The trade finance gap is estimated around USD 2.5 trillion, roughly ten percent of world merchandise trade. For smaller and mid-market companies, that number shows up as repeated rejections, long delays, or offers that arrive too late for the underlying commercial opportunity.


Bank surveys show a clear split. Large corporates often face single-digit rejection rates for trade finance. SMEs and mid-sized traders commonly face rejection rates in the 40 to 50 percent band.  The reasons are predictable: incomplete information, weak collateral, high compliance cost per ticket, and restrictive limits on certain countries, sectors, and counterparties. Many deals are dropped before any serious structuring work happens, even when the trade flow itself is sound.


The platform is designed to hit that choke point directly. Every submission is treated as a credit file in development, not a casual inquiry. Trade flows are mapped, cash cycles are described, security packages are defined, and realistic instruments are proposed. Borrowers receive a professional assessment instead of vague optimism. Lenders receive files that respect their basic policy rules from the outset.


The promise is clarity on both sides. Borrowers either receive an indicative path to a term sheet or a decisive, reasoned decline. Lenders and funds see deal flow that has passed a minimum bar on quality, documentation, and structure.