We provide lender-ready capital raise packaging and debt or equity placement support for business owners and buyers looking to secure serious term sheets and close funding on a defined timeline.
For business owners and acquirers pursuing private debt or equity, submit your deal for review. We revert within one working day with next steps and either a quote for our services.
For pre-submission discussions, we offer paid consultations. To initiate underwriting and lender outreach, submit the deal.
Mining Exploration And Capital Raising
If you are planning a copper–cobalt exploration program in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, you are not pitching “a good story.” You are presenting a risk-managed execution plan: secured tenure, defensible technical work, auditable budgets, and a funding pathway that matches your stage.
This guide is built for operators, sponsors, and boards who need investor-grade outputs, not generic commentary. It includes current, source-linked country stats, the permitting chain, what a credible drill program looks like on paper, and how to package a raise that survives real diligence.
Financely supports exploration companies and sponsors by building lender and investor-ready deal files and introducing qualified opportunities to an active capital network. If you want the process view first, start with How It Works.
The DRC matters because it is not “emerging.” It is already systemically important. When a country produces the majority share of a strategic mineral, financing terms, offtake behavior, and downstream compliance standards start reacting to DRC policy choices. That is why exploration in the copper belt is not just geology. It is market structure, traceability, permitting cadence, and export policy wrapped into a single underwriting problem.
If you are raising money, you should be ready to answer the question behind every investor’s question: “Can this team convert the ground into a compliant, financeable asset without losing years to rework?”
| Metric | Latest Value | Why It Matters For Exploration Funding | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cobalt mine production | 220,000 tonnes (2024); about 76% of world total (290,000 tonnes) | A dominant producer attracts policy interventions. Your funding case must model export policy risk, traceability requirements, and price volatility. | USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries (Cobalt) |
| Cobalt reserves | 6,000,000 tonnes (DRC reserves estimate) | Reserve scale supports long-life mine development, but exploration capital is earned only when you prove continuity, grade, metallurgy, and permitting feasibility. | USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries (Cobalt) |
| Copper mine production | 3,300,000 tonnes (2024) | “District scale” does not excuse weak targeting. Your drill plan must show why your block can compete for capital inside a high-output province. | USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries (Copper) |
| Copper reserves | 80,000,000 tonnes (DRC reserves estimate) | Large reserve baselines raise investor expectations. You need a pathway from targets to resources to studies, not just “more drilling.” | USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries (Copper) |
| Merchandise exports | US$ 27,727 million (2023) | Investors will ask where FX comes from, how export corridors work, and what disruptions do to schedules and working capital. | World Bank WITS Trade Snapshot (DRC) |
| Top export products | Copper cathodes: US$ 16.69B (2023) Cobalt oxides/hydroxides: US$ 4.78B (2023) |
Downstream form matters. Selling cathodes versus concentrates changes counterparties, payment terms, and offtake economics, which changes the funding toolkit. | World Bank WITS Top Exports (DRC) |
| Export destination concentration | Exports to China: US$ 15.97B (2023), 57.58% partner share | Concentration affects sanction risk exposure, buyer power, and financing optionality. Serious memos show how you diversify offtake pathways. | World Bank WITS Export Partners (DRC) |
| Cobalt export policy (recent) | Quota system replacing export ban: remainder-2025 cap and annual caps stated for 2026–2027 | Policy can cap your monetization path. If you are raising capital, your base case should show compliance and timing under quota constraints. | Reuters reporting on quotas |
| ASM traceability action (recent) | Suspension of artisanal copper and cobalt processing pending traceability controls (reported Dec 2025) | Whether you touch ASM or not, downstream compliance now shapes pricing, buyers, and fund mandates. Expect diligence questions on provenance and controls. | Reuters reporting on traceability action |
How to use these stats in a raise: Do not paste numbers into a deck and stop there. Attach each number to a decision: your market narrative (why now), your risk narrative (policy and corridor), and your monetization narrative (product form and counterparties). When your numbers are source-linked, the next question becomes your execution ability, which is exactly where strong teams differentiate.
“Tenure” means your legal right to explore and, later, to apply to mine. In investor language, tenure answers a brutal question: “Are we funding science, or funding a lawsuit?” In the DRC mining regime, a typical pathway is reconnaissance or prospecting activity followed by an exploration permit (often referenced as a research permit or permis de recherches ) and, later, an exploitation permit ( permis d’exploitation ) once a deposit is demonstrated and requirements are met.
Duration matters because it defines how much technical work you can credibly promise. Under the revised DRC mining code, exploration permits are commonly referenced as five years with a renewal framework in practice. Investors also watch for relinquishment rules and compliance obligations because they can shrink your footprint if you miss deadlines. For primary legal text, see the published mining code PDF, and for a plain-English summary of typical durations, see the legal overview referenced below.
The mining cadastre is the registration and title system that tracks who holds which perimeter, what status it has, and what is pending. Investors will not treat title as “fine” unless you show documentary evidence: application receipts, titles, boundaries, and any overlaps or disputes. If you cannot prove chain-of-title cleanly, you will lose time and bargaining power during a raise.
Good standing is not a moral label. It is a compliance state. It means fees paid, reporting submitted, work commitments met, and no unresolved breaches. Most sophisticated investors will insist on a condition precedent that your permits remain valid through the funding period, with remedies if status changes.
A financing plan that assumes “permits move instantly” will fail in committee. Administrative cadence matters, and public communiqués can change timelines. For example, the DRC’s mining cadastre authority (CAMI) periodically issues notices about office operations and service availability. If you are building a schedule for a drill campaign, you should track these notices and bake in buffer.
If you want a concrete starting point for how such notices appear and are communicated, see CAMI’s official communiqués page (example notice link below). Investors respect teams that treat administrative timing as a risk to manage, not an excuse after the fact.
Example official notice (CAMI): Communiqué DG/003/2026 (CAMI). If the page is slow, that is not unusual for public portals. Capture and archive the notice in your data room for diligence.
“Exploration stage” is not a vibe. It is a definition that determines valuation logic, instrument choice, and how investors measure progress. A serious raise explains the stage using deliverables, not adjectives. Below is a practical stage map for DRC copper–cobalt exploration campaigns, with the jargon explained in plain terms.
Target generation is the process of narrowing a perimeter into “drillable” priorities using geoscience evidence. This usually includes desktop work, structural interpretation, geochemistry, and geophysics. The output is a ranked target list with coordinates, rationale, and a plan to test. If your deck says “high potential” but cannot show the targeting logic, capital will price you like a lottery ticket.
Drilling is where stories die or become assets. “RC” means reverse circulation, which is often faster and cheaper for initial testing. “Diamond core” drilling produces high-quality samples and structural information that supports resource modeling, but it is typically slower and more expensive. Investors will ask why you chose one method, what your meterage buys, and how results will change the next decision gate.
Resource definition is a structured drill program designed to estimate a mineral resource with confidence categories. You will hear terms like “inferred” and “indicated.” What matters is not the label, but whether your drill spacing, QA/QC, and geological model are consistent with a credible resource estimate under a recognized reporting code.
A scoping study (often called a preliminary economic assessment) is a first-pass economic view. A PFS (pre-feasibility study) and FS (feasibility study) increase engineering definition and reduce uncertainty. Each step tightens capital cost estimates, operating cost assumptions, and execution risk. If you pitch project finance too early, lenders will decline because you have not earned “bankability” yet.
In this context, bankable does not mean “a bank will lend today.” It means the work product is structured so that external parties can verify it without relying on your optimism. Verification is the true commodity. You can be early-stage and still be fundable if your data is traceable, your plan is coherent, and your governance reduces execution risk.
This is also where many exploration raises fail: the team has a real target, but the data room is chaotic, chain-of-custody is weak, budgets are not auditable, and the permitting narrative is unclear. Capital providers will not fund confusion.
A credible DRC copper–cobalt drill campaign raise should not start with “we need money to drill.” It should start with “here is the evidence, here is the plan, here is the control system, and here is what success looks like.” Below is a minimum pack that can survive real diligence.
Keyword-driven investor reality: If you want capital for “DRC copper cobalt exploration drilling,” “Katanga copper belt exploration program,” or “battery metals exploration funding,” you must show that you know what money buys. Meterage, sample integrity, turnaround time, and decision gates are what investors pay for. “Potential” is what they discount.
Exploration capital is not one product. Different funding routes exist because different stages carry different risk types. The same asset can be unfinanceable under one structure and financeable under another, depending on whether you can offer security, cashflows, or collateral. The right question is not “can we raise money,” but “what instrument fits the proof we can show today?”
Equity and convertibles are common at target generation and first-pass drilling because there is no stable cashflow to lend against. Investors will price governance and reporting quality heavily at this stage. If you present a tight, auditable program, you reduce the “trust discount,” which often matters more than the geology narrative.
Strategic capital often arrives when your deposit shape becomes clearer and downstream parties can model feedstock. Offtake-linked funding can be powerful, but it can also trap you with pricing concessions if signed too early. A disciplined process uses competitive tension and clean documentation before granting exclusivity.
Royalty and streaming structures are not “free money.” They are a monetization choice that sells a portion of future upside for certainty today. They can fit when you have a credible path to production and want non-dilutive style funding, but the asset must be developed enough to underwrite.
Project finance typically arrives after studies, permits, and contracts support predictable cashflows. It is debt sized off cash generation, not off hope. If you want the lender-grade process view, see our project finance overview: Project Finance.
Financely is an advisory firm. We do not lend. We build the deal package to a standard that capital providers can underwrite, then we run a controlled outreach process to a lender and investor network that matches your stage and structure. That distinction matters because exploration funding is not won by sending decks. It is won by making diligence easy and decisioning fast.
Our work is transaction-led: we define the raise objective, structure the narrative around verifiable evidence, build the data room index to match credit and investment committee logic, and position the opportunity to reduce avoidable risk. If you want the broader scope of what we do, see What We Do. If you want to understand how we package opportunities across structured finance workflows, see Structured Finance Deal Origination.
If you have a defined perimeter, a drill plan (or target-generation plan), and a clear funding ask, submit your deal. We will assess readiness, identify missing diligence items, and advise a realistic capital path aligned with your stage.
Submit Your Deal“Fundable” means your project can be verified, managed, and reported without heroic assumptions. Investors are not only underwriting grade potential. They are underwriting your ability to execute: title clarity, data integrity, operational realism, and governance controls. A fundable early-stage drill campaign typically has clean tenure evidence, a ranked target list with a technical rationale, a drilling plan that links meterage to decision gates, and an auditable budget that shows unit costs and timelines. It also includes QA/QC procedures and chain-of-custody logic for samples, because downstream traceability expectations are rising and can affect buyer interest. If your materials cannot answer basic diligence questions quickly, investors will either price you aggressively or walk, even if the geology looks promising.
They matter because market structure drives policy behavior, and policy behavior changes financing terms. The DRC is a dominant cobalt supplier, and that dominance has been linked to export policy interventions in recent years. When investors see quota regimes and compliance actions in the market, they start demanding stronger provenance controls, clearer offtake pathways, and more conservative schedule buffers. Your raise should not pretend policy is irrelevant. It should show how you remain financeable under timing disruption, price volatility, and compliance tightening. A good memo ties market stats to concrete mitigants: diversified buyer strategy, documented chain-of-title, ESG baseline work, and a staged budget that can pause or pivot if conditions change. Source-linked trade and production data also helps you avoid credibility losses during diligence.
Most failures are not “bad geology.” They are preventable execution gaps. The top failure modes we see are: unclear permit status or weak chain-of-title documentation, unrealistic drill schedules that ignore mobilization and administrative cadence, budgets that are not auditable at line-item level, weak sample chain-of-custody and QA/QC, and a data room that forces investors to guess what is missing. Another common failure is mismatch between stage and instrument. Teams sometimes pitch project finance language before they have studies and contracts that support debt sizing. Finally, failure can come from narrative confusion: the deck says “exploration,” but the use-of-funds reads like a development plan with no permitting or engineering basis. A serious raise is consistent: stage, plan, budget, and instrument all point to the same execution reality.
Yes, if you are disciplined. Pre-resource raises are possible, but they require tight packaging because uncertainty is highest at this stage. We focus on (1) clarity of tenure and compliance status, (2) technical logic that converts targets into a test plan, (3) a budget and schedule that is defensible, and (4) a reporting framework that capital providers can trust. The objective is to remove “avoidable risk.” You cannot remove geological uncertainty, but you can remove documentation chaos, governance uncertainty, and budget ambiguity. When those are removed, investors can price your project on the right variable, which is geological outcome, rather than punishing you for basic process weaknesses.
If you want to raise exploration capital faster, treat your drill campaign like a financeable project: clean tenure, verifiable data, auditable budgets, and stage-appropriate structures. For practical packaging guidance, see How to build a fundable deal file.
Financely advises growth-focused businesses on accessing capital by introducing their opportunities to professional investors. Financely is not a securities broker or dealer. Where appropriate, engagements are coordinated with regulated broker-dealers, investment banks, legal counsel, and other specialists.
Financely does not solicit, offer, or accept orders to buy or sell securities and makes no assurance regarding capital-raising outcomes.
Services are strictly business-to-business. Financely does not provide personal finance, consumer credit, or retail advisory services.
Advisory services are reserved for post-revenue companies that recognize the time and resources required for professional underwriting.
To proceed,
request a quote
and receive indicative commercial terms. If you require guidance before engaging,
book a paid telephone consultation.
Security notice: we are aware of third parties using Financely’s name without authorization. Only emails sent from our official domains and communications through our portal are valid. Please verify any outreach before sharing documents or sending payments, and read our impersonation warning.
Email supportdesk@financely-group.com for general enquiries, press & partnership requests.
All mandates start with an RFQ. We review submissions, issue a brief Go/No-Go memo, and where bankable, release a Term Sheet that leads to funding. We arrange capital across Senior Secured, Unitranche, Second Lien/Mezzanine, Preferred Equity, and Gap Solutions. We do not process deals by email or chat.
Letters of Credit, Standby LCs, Confirmations, Receivables Finance, and Inventory Lines with control.
Funding arranged for trade flows with instruments sized to your cycle and aligned to delivery and settlement.
Move forward to secure working capital and keep goods moving. Submit the RFQ to start underwriting for funding.
Limited or non-recourse structures for energy and infrastructure with lender-ready materials.
Funding solutions aligned to project cash flows with credible covenants and conditions to reach notice to proceed.
Advance the file to termable status. Submit the RFQ so we can underwrite and secure funding.
Debt and Preferred solutions anchored on cash flow, Quality of Earnings, and clear closing mechanics.
Funding across senior, unitranche, and preferred to match stable cash flows and acquisition timelines.
Get financed on workable terms for closing. Submit the RFQ to start underwriting.
Acquisition, development, bridge, and refinance with lender-ready packs and third-party reports managed.
Funding calibrated to DSCR, leverage, and tenancy with terms designed to close.
Move to a financeable package. Submit the RFQ to initiate underwriting for funding.
KYC and Source of Funds required. Engagements are best-efforts and subject to underwriting. Preference for operating companies with meaningful revenue. See our FAQ and Procedure.
Financely Inc. (“Financely”) provides corporate-finance advice and is wholly owned by Aurora Bay Trust, a trust formed under Bahamian law, together with its authorized affiliates. Depending on deal structure, jurisdiction, and local rules, engagements may be carried out through Financely Group LLC, a non-deposit-taking, non-banking financial company; Ashford Capital Advisory LLC; or another related entity.
Financely and its affiliates are not registered as securities broker-dealers and do not execute securities transactions or hold client funds or securities. When a mandate involves the purchase or sale of securities and a registered intermediary is required, any orders are introduced to and executed by one or more independent U.S. broker-dealers registered with the SEC and FINRA. Those broker-dealers are solely responsible for trade execution, custody, and related regulatory obligations. Nothing in this material constitutes an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to buy or sell any security or to engage in any specific transaction. Before engaging Financely Group LLC, Ashford Capital Advisory LLC, or any affiliate, you are responsible for confirming that such engagement complies with your own legal, regulatory, tax, and other requirements. In the United States, certain advisory activities may be conducted in reliance on exemptions available under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, including the “foreign private adviser” exemption where applicable. Our services and regulatory status may vary by jurisdiction and by transaction type.
Click
here to download our brochure. Email
supportdesk@financely-group.com for general enquiries.
