10 Hard Truths About “No Upfront Fee” SBLC Requests
Polite but direct: asking for a standby letter of credit with no upfront costs tells serious lenders you don’t grasp how bank paper is created.
Before any MT760 is sent, real money is spent on underwriting, counsel, KYC/AML screening, documentation, and SWIFT. Expecting others to carry that
spend while you contribute nothing is not “good negotiating”; it shows you’re not sponsor-ready.
The core problem
Many “no upfront fee” requests come from sponsors with no collateral
and no budget for third-party work, yet they want a bank to back their performance.
If it were as easy as “issue the SBLC and I’ll pay later,” anyone could open a bank account, accept wires and SBLCs on demand, and settle costs afterwards.
Markets don’t work like that; risk is priced at the start.
The 10 hard truths
1) No collateral, no credibility.
Asking a bank to guarantee you while bringing nothing to the table is a fast rejection.
2) Underwriting comes first.
Credit teams validate obligors, limits, documentation, and enforceability before
any pre-advice or issuance.
3) Opportunity cost is real.
Avoiding a modest diligence budget often costs more through lost discounts, execution delays, and damaged reputation.
4) SWIFT and counsel are cash items.
MT799/MT760 traffic, external opinions, and compliance tools are paid in advance. Third parties don’t wait for “proceeds.”
5) “Pay at closing” attracts fraud.
That line pulls in broker chains and time-wasters. Serious providers avoid it.
6) Equity still matters.
An SBLC enhances credit; it doesn’t replace sponsor commitment or working capital.
7) KYC/AML is non-negotiable.
Source-of-funds, UBO checks, sanctions, and contract provenance must be cleared—again, paid work upfront.
8) “Leased SBLC” is a myth.
Banks issue, confirm, or advise. They don’t lease guarantees. Walk away when you hear this.
9) RWA/pre-advice letters follow diligence.
They aren’t handed out so you can “shop a deal.” They appear once the work is largely complete.
10) Issuance is an endpoint.
Receiving an SBLC isn’t the whole game; it’s the result of underwriting, documentation, and paid third-party inputs.
Myths vs reality
| Myth |
Reality |
| “No upfront; fees from proceeds.” |
Legal, compliance, data work, and SWIFT land before issuance. No funding, no workflow. |
| “Provider can guarantee approval.” |
Mandates are best-efforts. Outcome depends on underwriting and bank capacity. |
| “Rush an MT760 this week.” |
Data rooms, contracts, and approvals take time. Rushing triggers rejections. |
| “Leased SBLC available.” |
Not a banking product. It’s broker slang. Avoid. |
| “Just issue a letter so I can show my buyer.” |
Comfort/RWA letters follow diligence; they aren’t marketing props. |
What a credible SBLC process looks like
- Screening:
Sponsor profile, use of proceeds, counterparties, jurisdiction, sanctions risk.
- Mandate & retainer:
Funds data mapping, legal pre-check, and a structuring memo.
- Data room:
Audited financials, contracts, receivables aging (if relevant), corporate docs, KYC/UBO.
- Structuring:
Amount, tenor, fee grid, conditions, covenants, and draw mechanics (ISP98/UCP600 as required).
- Bank/legal workflows:
Term sheet, drafts, opinions, operational checks.
- Issuance:
Instrument dispatched via SWIFT once conditions are met.
Timelines depend on deal complexity and responsiveness. Expect weeks, not days.
Expected cost items (before and at issuance)
| Item |
When Paid |
Purpose |
| Non-refundable retainer |
On mandate |
Data work, initial legal review, structuring memo, distribution prep. |
| Bank/legal third-party fees |
Pre-issuance |
External counsel, document drafting, compliance tools, opinions. |
| Issuer/confirming bank fees |
At issuance |
Instrument charges and SWIFT; amendments if any. |
| Success fee |
At closing/funding |
Payable on executed instrument or funded outcome per mandate. |
Who we work with (and who we don’t)
- We work with:
Post-revenue companies, clear use of proceeds, decision-makers who can fund diligence, clean governance.
- We don’t work with:
“No upfront” shoppers, broker chains, guaranteed-outcome requests, or crypto-only payment proposals outside official channels.
Ready to pursue a bankable process? If you understand collateral, opportunity cost, and underwriting—and you’re prepared to fund third-party work—we’ll structure and place your request with credible issuers.
Request Advisory Support
Financely Group is a capital advisory firm. We arrange standby letters of credit through licensed banks on a best-efforts basis.
All services are subject to KYC/AML, sanctions screening, and legal review. We do not issue instruments directly.
Red flags we reject: guaranteed offers, unsolicited broker chains, and crypto payments via unofficial channels.