Why Unrealistic Sponsors Destroy Their Own Credibility With Lenders
There is a specific type of sponsor who manages to disqualify themselves before underwriting even begins. They insist on 100 percent financing, refuse to contribute equity, refuse to pay for any professional work, and then announce that any advisor who declines their terms is “a scam”. The irony is simple. Their own behaviour is what blocks them from ever being taken seriously by lenders or arrangers.
Serious capital providers judge sponsors on signals. When a sponsor writes “we have no equity and do not pay upfront fees” and follows up with “you are scammers” after being declined, they demonstrate exactly the traits credit committees try to avoid. It is commercially foolish, reputationally damaging, and it guarantees that their name circulates on internal “do not engage” lists instead of lender shortlists.
How Professional Lenders Read Your “No Equity, No Fees” Email
Many of these sponsors genuinely believe they sound confident and sophisticated. In reality, their own wording tells lenders exactly why the deal should be ignored. A typical opening line looks like this:
“We require a facility of 50M USD. We expect 100% financing, no equity from our side, and no upfront fees of any kind.”
On the surface it looks assertive. Underneath, any experienced reader sees immediate problems:
- There is no reference to past track record, audited results, or executed projects.
- There is no discussion of risk sharing, only demands for other people’s capital.
- The sponsor is effectively saying they place zero of their own balance sheet behind the proposal.
When that same sponsor adds:
“If you are real you will work on success fee only and prove you can fund first,”
they confirm to any credit professional that they do not understand basic allocation of cost and risk. That is not strength. It is a loud signal of inexperience.
| What they insist on |
How lenders interpret it |
| “We will not provide financial statements or KYB until you prove you can fund.” |
Sponsor does not understand that credit decisions start with data. It suggests poor governance or something to hide. |
| “We will not pay any retainer, due diligence fee, or legal deposit.” |
Sponsor wants other parties to fund their pursuit costs. They are not prepared to stand behind their own project. |
| “We need your proof of funds letter first, then we will share details.” |
Sponsor has not worked with institutional capital before and is repeating phrases from inexperienced intermediaries. |
| “Any advisor who charges fees is a scam.” |
Sponsor has little or no exposure to regulated advisory processes and is likely to generate reputational risk for anyone involved. |
The Signalling Problem: Why Their Approach Is Financially And Reputationally Foolish
Capital markets are built on signals. Everything a sponsor writes or refuses to write sends a message about their seriousness. Sponsors who put demands ahead of facts signal that they value their time but not anyone else’s. Sponsors who want unlimited capital while risking nothing of their own signal that they see other people’s balance sheets as disposable.
That is commercially foolish for two simple reasons. First, lenders price and structure risk. If a sponsor refuses any economic contribution, there is no price that makes that acceptable. Second, reputations move quickly among real capital providers. Names attached to aggressive emails with “no equity, no fees, 100 percent financing, or you are scammers” do not disappear. They are remembered, forwarded, and quietly excluded from serious conversations.
Many of these individuals believe that loud confidence can substitute for substance. It does the opposite. Excessive self promotion combined with no equity and no tolerance for normal terms tells every credit officer that if the deal goes wrong, the sponsor will be the first to walk away and the last to accept responsibility.
Why Attacking Advisors As “Scammers” Is A Strategic Mistake
When an advisor explains that a deal does not qualify, or that fees and equity are required, a rational sponsor can do one of two things. They can adjust their position, or they can walk away calmly. The sponsors we are describing choose a third route. They send messages in capital letters announcing:
“YOU ARE A SCAM ORGANIZATION. DO NOT CONTACT US AGAIN. WE WILL EXPOSE YOU.”
They seem to believe this is a clever tactic. In reality it only proves three things:
- They cannot distinguish between a firm that declines a non-viable proposal and an actual fraud.
- They are willing to use reckless language in writing, which is a serious red flag for any professional counterparty.
- They are comfortable attempting to damage reputations when they do not get the conditions they want.
That behaviour is not only unprofessional. It builds a written record that can be presented to other advisors and lenders as an example of why the same sponsor should be avoided. They damage their own future financing attempts to score a short emotional win in a single email thread.
How We Protect Our Platform And Our Name From This Behaviour
At Financely we have no interest in engaging in public arguments with sponsors who write this way. We have a duty to protect our clients, our lender relationships, and our own brand from being dragged into that level of conduct. So the response is controlled and systematic.
1. Classification and blacklisting
Sponsors who demand 100 percent financing with no equity and accuse counterparties of “scam” behaviour when declined are classified internally as high risk and non-serious. Their details are placed on do not engage lists. Time is not spent trying to educate them into basic market standards.
2. Written response and closure
They receive one firm written response correcting their claims, confirming removal from any mailing lists if requested, and making clear that their language is unacceptable. The file is then closed. There is no attempt to “save” the relationship. The relationship has already been defined by their own conduct.
3. Evidence and escalation options
Emails and statements that describe Financely as a “scam organization” are retained. If those comments remain private, they serve only as a record of why we disengaged. If they are published or circulated in a wider setting, they may form the basis for formal notice, removal requests, or other remedies where the applicable law allows.
4. Protection of counterparties
Where appropriate, and without breaching confidentiality, patterns of behaviour are described to trusted funding partners so they can form their own view. Lenders appreciate early warnings about parties who fail basic tests of honesty and proportionality. This is part of protecting the quality of deal flow for everyone involved.
None of this is about silencing disagreement. Sponsors are free not to like our terms. They are not free to rewrite reality, describe ordinary commercial discipline as fraud, and then expect to be welcomed back when they change their mind.
How Serious Sponsors Build Credibility Instead Of Destroying It
By contrast, serious sponsors treat their own credibility as part of their capital. They recognise that every email, every term sheet negotiation, and every conversation with an advisor leaves an impression that will either help or hurt the next deal. They do not confuse firmness with aggression, and they do not confuse confidence with entitlement.
A credible sponsor:
- Presents clear documentation and accepts that this is the starting point, not an optional extra.
- Contributes meaningful equity and understands that risk sharing is non negotiable.
- Engages on fees like a professional, even if they decide the proposal is not right for them.
- Can end a discussion with a simple “thank you, we will not proceed” without emotional escalation.
The result is predictable. They may not close every deal, but they are invited back. Their name appears on lists of serious sponsors, not on warnings. Over time that difference is worth far more than any short-term attempt to bully an advisor into working without clear terms.
Ready To Approach Capital Providers Like A Serious Sponsor
If you have defined equity, verifiable financials, and a clear project or acquisition, Financely can help structure and arrange suitable facilities through its network of lenders and partners. Share a concise summary and supporting documents, and we will tell you directly whether there is a credible path to market.
Discuss Your Capital Raising Needs
Financely acts as arranger and advisor through regulated partners. Where lending or securities activity requires registration, activity is carried out by or through appropriately licensed firms in the relevant jurisdictions. Nothing in this article is an offer to lend or an offer of securities, nor is it a commitment to provide financing. References to quotes and behaviours describe common patterns observed in the market and do not constitute legal findings about any specific individual or entity. All mandates remain subject to KYC, AML, sanctions screening, full credit approval by funding counterparties, and formally executed agreements.