Trade Finance Risk
What Can Go Wrong in a Letter of Credit Transaction
Letters of credit reduce payment risk only when the documents, timing, and counterparties behave.
Most failures are not dramatic. They are small operational mismatches that trigger refusals, holds, delays, or disputes.
This guide maps the real failure points across documentary compliance, logistics, fraud, and bank risk.
If you want lender-facing structuring support, submit your deal here: Submit Your Deal.
Why Letters of Credit Fail in Practice
An LC is a documentary instrument. Banks pay against documents, not goods.
That creates a gap between what traders think matters and what the bank is actually allowed to do.
The LC can be “good” commercially and still fail operationally if the documents do not comply or the bank cannot release funds due to compliance constraints.
Key idea:
the LC is a compliance and operations test disguised as a payment tool.
If your shipping reality cannot produce compliant documents on time, you are taking risk you did not price.
1) Documentary Discrepancies
Discrepancies are the number one reason LCs fail or slow down.
The bank checks the presented documents against the LC terms and the rules of documentary credits.
Minor formatting or data mismatches can trigger refusal or a request to waive discrepancies.
Common Discrepancy Traps
- Names, addresses, spellings, or company suffixes not matching the LC
- Invoice description not matching the LC description line by line
- Shipment dates, presentation periods, and expiry miscalculated
- Bill of lading not “clean” or not issued as required
- Ports, notify party, consignee, or vessel details inconsistent
- Certificates missing, unsigned, or issued by the wrong party
- Partial shipment or transshipment not allowed but occurred
Typical Outcomes
- Bank refusal and a scramble to cure within deadlines
- Buyer gains leverage to renegotiate price or timing
- Amendments that create extra fees and schedule drift
- Seller cash flow stress and forced borrowing
2) LC Terms That Are Not Operationally Workable
Many LCs are drafted by parties who are not close to the logistics and document production workflow.
The terms can be “legally fine” but practically impossible.
That is how sellers end up agreeing to an LC that guarantees future discrepancies.
| Bad LC Term Pattern |
Why It Breaks |
Better Alternative |
| Unrealistic shipment and presentation windows |
Docs cannot be obtained, checked, and couriered in time |
Align windows to real production and logistics timelines |
| Documents only the buyer can issue |
Buyer can delay issuance and force leverage |
Use third-party certificates where possible |
| Over-specific document wording |
Carriers and inspectors use standard forms |
Define document type and key fields, not custom language |
| Conflicting transport and incoterms requirements |
Shipment reality contradicts LC terms |
Reconcile incoterms, title transfer, and document set early |
3) Fraud and Document Risk
Banks and insurers treat trade fraud as a first-order risk.
A deal can look profitable and still be unfinanceable if the document chain and title chain are not verifiable.
Common Fraud Vectors
- Forged bills of lading or altered transport documents
- Duplicate financing against the same cargo or invoices
- Document substitution, fake inspection, fake warehouses
- Collusion with logistics counterparties
How It Shows Up Operationally
- Bank compliance holds and escalations
- Requests for original verification and shipping confirmations
- Insurance exclusions or claim denials
- Frozen payments, litigation, and reputational damage
4) Bank Risk, Country Risk, and Confirmation Gaps
Many traders assume “bank risk” means “safe.” That is incomplete.
The issuing bank’s strength, jurisdiction, and ability to transfer funds matter.
If you need to convert issuing bank and country risk into stronger bank risk, confirmation is the tool, but it must be explicit and unconditional.
Practical point:
an LC issued by a weak bank or in a restricted jurisdiction can behave like a buyer promise with extra paperwork.
If the bank is not acceptable, negotiate confirmation or restructure the payment mechanics.
5) Sanctions, AML, and Compliance Holds
Even with perfect documents, banks can delay or block processing due to screening.
Flags can come from vessel history, routing, ports, counterparties, beneficial owners, or goods categories.
This is not theoretical. It is one of the most common reasons “clean deals” get stuck.
6) Logistics and Shipment Failures
LCs are unforgiving on timelines. Late shipment, missed cut-offs, missing originals, or transport disruptions create document timing failures.
If your logistics plan does not match the LC mechanics, you are relying on waivers, amendments, or luck.
Where Logistics Breaks LCs
- Missed latest shipment dates
- Demurrage and port delays affecting document production
- Wrong transport mode versus LC requirements
- Partial shipments where prohibited
How to Reduce This Risk
- Align LC terms with the forwarder’s standard documents
- Build buffers into shipment and presentation windows
- Run a pre-shipment document rehearsal
- Keep a single version of the LC and document checklist
7) Insurance Gaps and Claims Friction
Insurance requirements often get treated as a box-checking exercise.
In reality, wrong insured party, wrong insured value basis, gaps in coverage legs, or exclusions can make the “secured” trade unsecured when it matters.
Banks notice misalignment quickly, and so do insurers after a loss.
8) Cost Creep, Amendments, and Discrepancy Fees
LCs can be cost-effective when the workflow is stable.
When it is not, amendments and discrepancy handling create a quiet margin leak.
Each amendment can add fees, extend timelines, and create more opportunities for mismatch.
9) Contract and LC Misalignment
If the sales contract and LC are not aligned, you can perform commercially but fail documentary compliance.
The LC should reflect the contract’s goods description, incoterms, tolerances, quality and inspection logic, and timing.
Any mismatch becomes an argument later, usually when money is at stake.
10) Internal Operational Mistakes
Many failures are self-inflicted: no ownership for the document checklist, inconsistent templates, late couriering, and no version control.
If you treat documentation as an afterthought, the LC becomes a trap rather than a tool.
A Practical Control Map for LC Transactions
| Risk Point |
Control |
What To Do Before Shipment |
| Discrepancies |
Document checklist ownership |
Match every required document field to a real issuer and template |
| Unworkable terms |
Draft LC review |
Reject or amend impossible clauses before acceptance |
| Fraud exposure |
Verification and inspection |
Use credible third parties and verifiable title chain mechanics |
| Bank and country risk |
Issuing bank acceptability |
Confirm if needed, or restructure payment security |
| Sanctions holds |
Pre-screening and transparency |
Check counterparties, vessel routing, and beneficial ownership early |
Where Financely Fits
Financely supports trade finance structuring and lender decisioning.
We help clients align contracts, LC terms, logistics, and document sets to reduce friction and shorten time to written outcomes.
If licensing is required for execution, we coordinate execution through appropriately licensed partners under their approvals.
To start, submit your trade and documentation pack here: Submit Your Deal.
FAQ
What is the most common reason an LC is not paid?
Documentary discrepancies. Even small mismatches between the LC and the presented documents can trigger refusal or delays while waivers and amendments are negotiated.
Does a letter of credit guarantee payment?
It guarantees payment only if compliant documents are presented on time and the bank can legally process the transaction. Compliance holds and bank or country constraints can still delay or block payment.
What should I check in the draft LC before I accept it?
Shipment dates, presentation period, required document list, document issuers, transport terms, inspection requirements, and whether partial shipments or transshipment are allowed based on your actual logistics.
When should I request confirmation?
When the issuing bank, jurisdiction, or transfer environment creates unacceptable risk for you. Confirmation converts the risk to a confirming bank, subject to confirmation terms and fees.
How do sanctions and AML checks affect LC payment timing?
Banks screen parties, vessels, routing, ports, goods, and beneficial owners. A hit can trigger requests for extra information, internal escalation, and payment delays even if documents are compliant.
How do I reduce discrepancy risk fast?
Rehearse the document set before shipment, use standard templates, maintain version control, and align the LC terms to what your forwarder and inspection providers can actually produce.
Request a Quote
If your LC is stalling or you want to reduce discrepancy risk before shipment, submit your trade file.
We will revert with a control checklist and a lender-facing structuring path.
Important:
This page is for general information only and does not constitute legal, tax, investment, or regulatory advice.
Financely is not a bank, not a broker-dealer, and not a direct lender.
Any engagement and any introduction process is subject to diligence, KYB, KYC, AML, sanctions screening, capital provider criteria, and definitive documentation.
Financely does not promise approvals or funding.