Beware of ''Ultra Fine Nano Copper Powder'' SKR Fraud Attempts

Ultra-Fine Copper Powder “SKR” Fraud Attempt

On 1 July 2025, Financely received a request to finance a metals repo transaction. The submission claimed ownership of 500 kilograms of “ultra-fine nano copper powder” with a stated purity of 99.99999%, allegedly stored in the Embrach Free-Zone. The applicant valued the material at €1.15 billion, which implies a unit price of more than USD 2,300 per gram.

The valuation was disconnected from any observable copper benchmark. When a collateral claim starts with a price that bears no relationship to transparent markets, diligence becomes mandatory before any discussion of leverage, recourse, or lender routing.

1) The Billion-Value Claim

The core issue was not “exotic” product form. It was the economics. With exchange-traded copper priced orders of magnitude lower on a per-gram basis, the submission required immediate verification of (1) what the asset actually was, (2) whether it existed as described, (3) who held title, and (4) whether a reputable warehouse and insurer would stand behind it.

2) Missing Documents, Missing Control

The applicant requested USD 450 million of non-recourse financing and provided no primary collateral documentation. There was no SKR, no inspection report, no insurance evidence, and no warehouse receipt. When asked to provide the documents, the response was:

“It is stored in Embrach Free-Zone. The SKR has been issued by ISE in Lucerne (Institute of Rare Earth & Metals). The analysis was done less than 6 months ago by the ISE. I have personally seen all the key documents in original.”

That explanation does not clear standard repo controls. Metals repo finance relies on credible third-party verification, insurance, and warehousing arrangements that a lender can audit. In mainstream practice, inspection and assay are typically performed by recognized groups such as SGS, Intertek, Cotecna, or Bureau Veritas. An unknown “institute” with no acceptance history in collateral markets does not substitute for an established inspector, collateral manager, or warehouse operator.

The refusal to provide documentary evidence in usable form was decisive. A lender cannot lend against “documents I saw in person.” It lends against documents that can be verified, relied upon, and enforced.

3) Financely’s Process and the Due Diligence Gate

For high-value asset-backed lending submissions where collateral is opaque or difficult to verify, Financely applies a formal gate before lender routing. In this case, we issued an engagement framework and an advanced diligence request focused on proving the asset, title, and custody arrangements.

Workstream What It Establishes Why It Matters
Legal structure and documentation Transaction enforceability, governing law, and financing mechanics Repo funding requires documentation a lender can enforce without ambiguity
Asset verification What the material is, purity, quantity, and fungibility No lender funds against unverified collateral descriptions
Title and custody Who owns it, where it is held, and who controls release Collateral must be controlled, not merely described
Warehousing and insurance Warehouse receipts, insurance policies, and claims handling Repo structures depend on custody and insured loss pathways
Independent legal opinion Confirmation of title, custody, and enforceability under the transaction framework High-value deals require independent counsel review to reduce fraud and execution risk

The diligence requirement was direct. If the party wanted funding, the asset and its custody had to be independently verified under a bank-grade framework. The applicant could appoint counsel or allow Financely to coordinate counsel. Either path required transparent documentation.

4) The Reaction to Scrutiny

Less than 45 minutes after receiving the advanced diligence requirements, the applicant’s tone changed sharply. The reply focused on criticizing governance, fees, and process, while avoiding the central issue: the absence of verifiable collateral documentation.

“Demands a substantial non-refundable fee of USD 189,250 upfront without any binding obligation… governed by the laws of England and Wales… provides no lender transparency, no performance benchmarks, and no enforceable commitments… hosts deal documents on Fiverr Workspace, which is highly unorthodox...”

This is a common failure pattern. When legal and documentary verification becomes unavoidable, the focus moves from proving the asset to disputing the process. The applicant then demands refunds, tries to force lender identity disclosure, or attempts to pressure the advisor into skipping controls.

5) A Standard SKR Fraud Pattern

The submission aligned with familiar SKR-driven commodity fraud signals. The specifics vary, but the structure repeats.

What We Saw

  • Collateral valued far beyond plausible market reference points
  • Reliance on unverifiable “institutes” instead of recognized inspectors
  • No warehouse receipt, insurance evidence, or inspection pack provided
  • Immediate interest in lender routing without passing documentation gates
  • Rapid disengagement when independent legal diligence was required

Why It Matters

  • Repo lenders fund controlled assets, not claims
  • Verification must be repeatable and auditable by third parties
  • Insurance and custody are not optional in collateral finance
  • Real counterparties accept scrutiny as part of execution
  • Resistance to diligence is often the signal, not the noise

6) A Separate Concern: Token Narratives

Public statements associated with the same party indicated ambitions to launch a gold-backed token. That is not a legal conclusion. It is a practical risk observation: if a party cannot pass basic collateral verification on physical metals, any digital asset claim tied to vaulted metals warrants heightened skepticism.

Verified Collateral and Verifiable Controls

Metals repo finance is not built on screenshots, unverifiable institutes, or inflated valuations. It is built on inspection, custody, insurance, and enforceable documentation that lenders can audit.

Submit a Verified Deal

Disclaimer: This content is based on verified communications with the submitting party between 30 June and 4 July 2025. Published in line with internal risk controls and market integrity standards. Correspondence is archived and may be shared with relevant authorities upon lawful request.

Get Started With Us

Submit Your Deal & Receive a Proposal Within 1-3 Working Days

Submit your deal using our secure intake form, and receive a quote within 1-3 business days. Existing clients can connect with their relationship manager through our secure web portal.


All submissions are promptly reviewed, and all communications are conducted through the intake form or the client portal for a seamless and secure process.

Express Application Submit Your Deal
Request a Proposal
Request a Proposal / Submit a Deal

Thank you for considering working with us. A nominal fee of US$500 is required upon completion of each form. This fee covers the time and effort we invest in reviewing your submission and crafting a thorough proposal. We receive numerous inquiries and prioritize those that carry this fee, ensuring serious applicants receive prompt attention.

Trade Finance

Tap into solutions like letters of credit, bank guarantees, and payment facilitation. We address the challenge of global transaction risk through structured strategies that foster cross-border growth. Complete the form to unlock streamlined funding aligned with your commercial objectives.

Submit a Request

Project Finance

Access non-recourse funding for infrastructure, renewable energy, or other capital-intensive ventures. We mitigate capital constraints by isolating project assets and focusing on risk management. Provide your details to receive a structure that drives growth and maximizes returns.

Submit a Request

Acquisitions

Secure financing for business or real estate acquisitions. We ease transaction hurdles by reviewing cash flow, synergy opportunities, and exit plans. Complete the form for a customized proposal that supports your strategic investment objectives.

Submit a Request

For Banks

Financely assists banks facing Basel III pressures by distributing trade finance deals and providing collateral for letters of credit. We reduce capital burdens while preserving client relationships and fostering service expansion. Submit your request to optimize your trade finance offerings.

Submit a Request

Once we receive your submission, our team will review your information to determine feasibility. If eligible, you will receive a proposal or term sheet within 1–3 business days. Visit our FAQ and Procedure pages for more information.

Disclaimer: Financely provides financing based on due diligence and feasibility. Approval is not guaranteed, and past performance does not predict future outcomes. All terms are subject to review. Financely primarily assists with structuring and distribution. Qualified parties carry out the project if the client approves the proposal.

Still Have Questions? Schedule a Consultation

If you still have questions after visiting our FAQ and Procedure pages, we invite you to book a paid consultation for personalized guidance. A $250 USD fee applies per session.