Top 10 Supply Chain Finance Companies (2026)
Trade And Working Capital

Top 10 Supply Chain Finance Companies

Supply Chain Finance is not a widget. It is a credit, onboarding, and payments operating system. If you pick the wrong provider, suppliers do not onboard, funding dries up, and the program becomes a slide deck. If you want a lender-ready program pack, start with Deal Packaging Services.

This is a practical shortlist of ten widely used Supply Chain Finance providers across bank and non-bank models. It is not a league table. The right choice depends on your supplier geography, ERP reality, onboarding tolerance, and how much risk control you are willing to accept.

What matters in the real world: supplier onboarding speed, multi-country KYB, ERP connectivity, dispute and payment controls, funding resilience, and clean legal structure of receivables purchase.

The List

Use the left menu to switch providers. Each entry includes a direct external link to the provider.

Top 10 Providers Select a name to view details

DBS

Often selected for Asia-linked supply chains where sponsor-led buyer programs and supplier enablement need a bank-grade operating model.

Buyer Programs Supplier Enablement Working Capital
External Link

How To Choose The Right SCF Provider

What To Test Why It Matters What “Good” Looks Like
Supplier Onboarding Speed Slow onboarding kills adoption. KYB workflow, multilingual support, low friction supplier UX.
KYB And Compliance Coverage Cross-border supplier bases trigger compliance bottlenecks. Clear policy set, escalation path, audit trail, sanctions screening readiness.
ERP And Data Connectivity No clean invoice feed means manual work and errors. Stable ERP connectivity, clean approvals data, predictable file formats.
Program Legal Structure You need a receivables structure that stands up to scrutiny. Clear purchase mechanics, true sale logic where applicable, defined recourse.
Funding Resilience Single-funder programs can freeze at the worst time. Bank pool or multi-funder approach, documented limits, defined risk controls.
Dispute And Payment Controls Disputes and reversals damage supplier trust. Clear dispute workflow, cut-off times, payment confirmation, reporting.
SCF can be mis-sold when it is treated as a headline APR product. If the program depends on weak invoices, hidden extensions, or unclear risk transfer, it becomes fragile. Build the operating rules first, then pick the funding.

Where Financely Fits

Program Pack, Not A Pitch Deck

We build the lender-ready and operator-ready pack: program structure, onboarding workflow, required policies, reporting outline, and counterparty positioning. This is the work that makes banks and platforms take you seriously.

Deal Packaging Services

Counterparty Routing

Once your program is structured cleanly, we route it to realistic counterparties based on geography, supplier mix, and control requirements. That usually beats emailing ten providers and hoping someone cares.

What We Do

Want A Supply Chain Finance Program That Funds?

Submit your supplier footprint, buyer profile, target limits, and ERP setup. We will respond with the next steps and what a lender-ready pack requires.

FAQ

Is SCF the same as factoring?

No. Many SCF programs are buyer-led and priced off buyer risk, while classic factoring is supplier-led and priced off supplier risk and receivables quality.

Do suppliers have to participate?

They choose. Adoption depends on cost, speed, and trust. If onboarding is painful, suppliers ignore it.

What kills an SCF program fastest?

Poor supplier adoption, weak invoice data flows, unclear dispute rules, and funding concentration that freezes when risk tightens.

Does SCF always reduce cost of goods?

Not always. It can support better terms and stability, but results depend on supplier behavior and your procurement leverage.

How long does implementation take?

Timing depends on ERP connectivity, KYB readiness, and supplier footprint. Small footprints can move quickly. Global footprints take longer.

Can Financely guarantee funding?

No. Funding is a third-party credit decision. We improve outcomes by making the program structured, documented, and underwriteable.

Disclaimer: This content is for commercial information only. It is not investment advice, legal advice, or a promise of credit. Provider selection and funding are subject to third-party underwriting, compliance, and documentation.