Standby Letter of Credit Wording Under ISP98, UCP 600, and URDG 758

Standby Letters of Credit are not “proof of money.” They are contingent payment undertakings. Wording is the whole game. If the standby is drafted loosely, the beneficiary cannot draw. If it is drafted aggressively, the applicant can trigger disputes, higher issuance costs, or outright refusal by the issuing bank’s compliance and credit teams.

Financely is an advisory firm. We are not a bank or issuer. We do not issue SBLCs or guarantees. We support clients by structuring the request, aligning the standby purpose to an executable document set, and coordinating issuance through regulated counterparties under their own approvals, KYC and AML, sanctions screening, and definitive documentation. The examples below are generic and must be adapted by counsel and the issuing bank.

Three Rulebooks That Shape SBLC Wording

In practice, “SBLC wording” is the combination of (1) the standby text, (2) the presentation documents, and (3) the rule set chosen in the instrument. The rule set changes how terms like “presentation,” “original,” “notice,” “dishonor,” and “time for examination” are interpreted.

ISP98

ISP98 was designed specifically for standby practice. It is usually the cleanest choice for classic standby structures such as payment standbys, performance standbys, bid bonds, and advance payment support.

  • Standby-first concepts and definitions
  • Typically simpler draw document sets
  • Clearer handling of common standby mechanics

UCP 600

UCP 600 was designed for documentary credits. It can still be used for standbys, especially where parties want documentary credit style document examination standards. It tends to fit better when the standby requires trade-like documents.

  • Documentary credit DNA
  • Often used when the draw requires shipping or invoice documents
  • Can add complexity for purely “demand” style draws

URDG 758

URDG 758 is for demand guarantees. Many markets use guarantees rather than SBLCs for similar risk transfer. If you are really drafting a demand guarantee, URDG is usually the cleanest rule set, especially for on-demand structures.

  • Guarantee-first practice standards
  • Demand and statement mechanics are central
  • Good fit for performance and advance payment style guarantees

A Practical Rule Choice

Do not pick rules based on what “sounds official.” Pick them based on the document set you can actually present, the bank’s comfort, and what is standard in your industry and jurisdiction.

Core Wording Blocks Every SBLC Should Get Right

Regardless of rule set, most disputes come from a handful of issues: unclear draw conditions, messy definitions, ambiguous expiry and presentation place, and vague statement requirements.

Examples Of SBLC Wording

The examples below show common patterns. These are not “one size fits all.” Banks will apply house formats, SWIFT field constraints, and internal risk policy. Use these as concept examples only.

Example 1: Payment SBLC Subject To ISP98

Example 2: Performance SBLC Subject To ISP98

A performance standby usually supports non-monetary obligations. The beneficiary draws based on a statement of breach, not by presenting invoices or shipping documents. Keep the statement short and avoid requiring “proof” that is hard to deliver.

Example 3: Demand Guarantee Subject To URDG 758

If the instrument is a demand guarantee rather than a standby, URDG 758 is commonly used. The draw often requires a demand and a statement indicating in what respect the applicant is in breach.

Example 4: SBLC Subject To UCP 600 With Documentary Presentation

UCP 600 can make sense when you want a documentary credit style draw. That usually means invoices, transport documents, and defined document examination standards. It is heavier operationally and easier to trip on discrepancies.

Common Drafting Mistakes That Cause Rejections

Overly Specific Statements

  • Requiring exact phrasing with too many variables
  • Requiring references to events that may be disputed or hard to evidence
  • Requiring documents controlled by the applicant

A demand statement should be short, clear, and executable. If you require the beneficiary to “prove” default through documents that do not exist, you create a standby that looks strong but cannot be drawn.

Unclear Expiry and Presentation Place

  • Expiry date stated without presentation place
  • Confusing “expiry at counters” versus “expiry at beneficiary location”
  • Undefined courier or SWIFT presentation mechanics

These issues produce last-minute disputes and missed deadlines. Clean drafting reduces operational risk.

Mismatched Rule Set

  • Using UCP 600 for a pure on-demand standby with no documentary logic
  • Using URDG-style demands inside an ISP98 standby without alignment
  • Mixing multiple rule sets without clarity

Vague Underlying Reference

  • Referring to “a contract” without date or identifying details
  • Referring to obligations that shift over time without a clear cap
  • Leaving the “amount due” undefined

Practical SBLC Wording Checklist Before You Request Issuance

How AI Fits Into SBLC Wording Review

AI can help extract clauses into a checklist and spot inconsistencies across drafts. It should not be the final reviewer. The risk is simple: a single wrong condition or a missing presentation detail can turn an instrument into a dispute. The clean approach is controlled drafting, counsel review where needed, and final alignment with the issuing bank’s house format.

High-Value Uses

  • Extract draw documents and compare them against the underlying contract obligations
  • Identify undefined terms, conflicting dates, and missing presentation information
  • Generate a structured version history and approval checklist

Controls Still Required

  • Do not upload confidential drafts into uncontrolled tools
  • Human review for legal meaning and operational feasibility
  • Final check against the issuing bank’s required format and policy

Request A Quote

If you are preparing an SBLC or demand guarantee request, share the underlying contract summary, purpose of the instrument, proposed draw documents, expiry requirements, and the issuing bank constraints. We will revert with a wording checklist, executable document set recommendations, and a structured issuance pathway through regulated counterparties.

Request A Quote

Disclaimer: This page is for general information only. It does not constitute legal, tax, regulatory, investment, or credit advice and it is not an offer or solicitation. Financely is not a bank, lender, broker-dealer, insurer, surety, or investment adviser. Any SBLC or guarantee is issued solely by regulated banks or institutions under their own approvals, policies, and documentation. All transactions are subject to due diligence, underwriting, KYC and AML review, sanctions screening, and execution of definitive agreements. Sample wording is illustrative and must be tailored and approved by the issuing bank and counsel.