Transaction-Led Trade Finance
How To Raise Funding For A Physical Commodity Contract
You can have a signed commodity contract, real counterparties, and a clear margin, then still fail to close because funding is not structured for the way cash moves in the deal. Most deals do not collapse on price. They collapse on timing, document control, and credit appetite.
This page is written for traders, independent sponsors, and operators that already have a real transaction and need an execution path to capital. If you are reviewing service scope first, you can see it on our trade finance advisory page
and full process flow on our workflow page.
Straight answer: funding follows structure. If your file is weak, no lender memo can rescue it. If your file is clean, you can raise capital even with tight timelines.
Financely runs a transaction-led model: submission, indicative terms, written mandate, underwriting package, lender distribution, and closing support.
What “Funding A Commodity Contract” Really Means
Raising funding for a commodity contract is not one product. It is a capital stack matched to the cash strain points in your cycle:
Pre-Shipment Need
Supplier needs deposit, packing, or lift costs before goods move. Capital can be structured as pre-export support, purchase-order-backed lines, or instrument-backed supplier comfort.
In-Transit Need
Cash is tied while cargo is on water or in trucking corridor. This phase often needs bridge capital tied to shipping evidence and title control.
Post-Shipment Need
Buyer pays on terms, not at discharge. Receivables financing or discounting can convert invoices into liquidity for the next cycle.
Security Layer
Counterparty may request LC, SBLC, or guarantee support. These are risk tools, not magic funding shortcuts. Wording and document logic decide if they work.
Main Funding Structures Used In Physical Commodity Deals
| Funding Structure |
What It Covers |
Best Use Case |
Common Failure Point |
| Import LC / Usance LC |
Payment certainty for supplier, timing support for buyer |
Cross-border flows with documentary control |
Document mismatch between contract and LC terms |
| SBLC-Backed Supplier Terms |
Contingent payment comfort to unlock better supplier terms |
Repeat corridors where supplier needs risk cover |
Poor draw conditions that cannot be enforced in practice |
| Pre-Export / Prepayment Support |
Upstream costs before shipment |
Origin-side production or aggregation models |
Weak offtake evidence and weak repayment map |
| Inventory / Warehouse Finance |
Working capital against stored goods |
Fast-turn inventory with monitored control points |
Unclear collateral control and release rights |
| Receivables Discounting / Factoring |
Liquidity against invoices due later |
Buyer has accepted payment record |
Invoice disputes and poor assignment drafting |
| Borrowing Base Facility |
Revolving line against eligible collateral |
Multi-shipment ongoing programs |
Weak reporting discipline and high concentration risk |
Funding is easier when contract terms, Incoterms, logistics chain, and payment route tell one coherent story. Mixed signals kill lender appetite fast.
What Lenders Check First
If you are serious about closing, prepare for these screens before sending your file out:
Counterparty Quality
They check the real parties, track record, and payment behavior. A strong commodity does not offset weak counterparties.
Contract Enforceability
They read default clauses, dispute path, assignment rights, and claim mechanics. Loose drafting invites decline.
Cash Waterfall
They map exactly how money moves from drawdown to repayment. If that map is vague, approval odds drop.
Document Control
They review inspection protocol, title chain, bills of lading logic, insurance, and release controls.
Compliance Stack
KYC, AML, sanctions checks, and source-of-funds clarity are gate items. Missing items stop process early.
Downside Recovery
They test what happens if buyer delays, price shifts, or shipment is disputed. No recovery plan means no comfort.
How Financely Helps You Raise Funding
We are not a call-heavy advisory shop. We run a transaction desk. Your mandate starts with a file and ends with lender terms or a written decline with reasons.
| Stage |
What We Deliver |
| 1) Intake And Fit Screen |
Commercial feasibility check, missing data list, and initial structure direction. |
| 2) Indicative Term Sheet Path |
Draft path with proposed facility style, fee logic, and required controls. |
| 3) Formal Mandate |
Written scope, fee terms, validity timeline, and execution standard. |
| 4) Underwriting Pack |
Lender-ready package: contract map, risk matrix, cash waterfall, and document logic. |
| 5) Distribution |
Targeted circulation to relevant funding channels with structured follow-up. |
| 6) Condition Cleanup |
Response handling, clause fixes, and support through legal and operational checkpoints. |
Who This Service Is Built For
Best fit is post-revenue companies, active traders, independent sponsors, and search-style buyers with real contracts and near-term closing pressure.
Not a fit for speculative files, fake instruments, or transactions with no clear counterparty chain.
Commercial Terms
Engagements are paid mandates with defined deliverables. No vague “success-only” loop. Typical retainers depend on file complexity, corridor risk, and speed requirement.
| Mandate Type |
Typical Retainer |
Success Fee Range |
| Single-Corridor Commodity Contract |
From USD 27,500 |
From 3.25% |
| Core Structured Trade Mandate |
From USD 59,500 |
From 2.25% |
| Multi-Country Complex Mandate |
From USD 95,000 |
From 1.50% |
Clear warning: nobody can promise approvals before underwriting. Any party that guarantees funding without full review is selling fiction.
Submit Your Physical Commodity Contract
If your deal is live and you need a real funding path, send the file for screening. You will get a structured next-step route, not vague advice.
Submit Your Deal
FAQ
Can you raise funding for first-time traders?
Yes, if the contract, counterparties, and payment route are credible and fully documented.
Do you provide direct lending?
No. We structure and place transactions through partner channels that make final credit decisions.
Can you work with LC and SBLC structures?
Yes. Documentary-credit and contingent-support structuring are core parts of our trade mandates.
How fast can a mandate move?
Speed depends on file quality, counterparty response times, and lender conditions after circulation.
What documents should we prepare first?
Draft or signed contract, product specs, Incoterms, logistics route, KYC pack, and current payment terms.
What if lenders decline?
You get decline reasons in writing. If structure can be repaired, we revise and continue within scope.