We provide lender-ready capital raise packaging and debt or equity placement support for business owners and buyers looking to secure serious term sheets and close funding on a defined timeline.
For business owners and acquirers pursuing private debt or equity, submit your deal for review. We revert within one working day with next steps and either a quote for our services.
For pre-submission discussions, we offer paid consultations. To initiate underwriting and lender outreach, submit the deal.
Fraud Awareness And Transaction Screening
Businesses, intermediaries, and deal teams still receive proposals that reference “IPIP,” “IPID,” “server-to-server (S2S) transfers,” or “DTC transfers” as if these are legitimate high-value payment mechanisms for moving large balances outside standard banking processes.
In most cases, these proposals are not describing a recognized banking or securities settlement product. They are describing a non-standard narrative built around institutional-sounding acronyms. The terminology changes, but the pattern is usually the same: vague mechanics, secrecy, outsized claims, and fee requests before any verifiable settlement pathway is established.
A common tactic is to borrow the names of real financial infrastructure providers or real message formats and then attach fictitious transfer mechanics to them. This is what makes these schemes persuasive to non-specialists. The acronym is real. The described process is not.
For example, parties may reference DTC, SWIFT, MT103, “screens,” or “settlement desks” and present them as interchangeable tools for moving cash or creating liquidity. In actual regulated practice, these terms refer to specific infrastructures, message formats, and account-based processes with participant rules and controls.
The Depository Trust Company (DTC) is part of U.S. securities market infrastructure. It is associated with custody and book-entry changes in ownership of securities, and with settlement-related services for securities markets. It is not a retail cash transfer channel and it is not a generic “funds release” mechanism for private parties.
For the baseline definition, review DTCC’s own DTC overview and service descriptions, which explain DTC in the context of securities custody, book-entry ownership changes, and settlement services for market participants: DTCC | The Depository Trust Company (DTC).
The problem is not that the acronyms sound unusual. The problem is that the proposals typically fail basic underwriting and operational checks. They do not identify a recognized instrument, a regulated settlement pathway, a real participant framework, or a verifiable commercial transaction that justifies the movement of funds.
| Term Used In The Proposal | Typical Claim | Due Diligence Concern |
|---|---|---|
| IPIP / IPID | A special transfer protocol that can move very large funds outside normal rails | No clearly recognized standard product definition, operating rulebook, or regulated participant process is identified |
| S2S (Server To Server) | Settlement can be completed through private server messaging between banks or “officers” | Messaging is not the same as legal settlement, account debiting, and final funds availability |
| “DTC Transfer” | Cash or liquidity can be moved via DTC using codes or manual procedures | DTC references are often being misused to imply a cash transfer mechanism that does not match normal DTC functions |
| “Manual Download MT103” | A payment exists once the receiving side “downloads” it or enters codes | An MT103 is a standardized payment message format, not a private unlock mechanism for unverified funds |
| “Top 25 Bank Program” | Exclusive access to a private bank platform with guaranteed returns | This matches long-standing prime bank fraud narratives repeatedly flagged by regulators |
Many of these proposals are functionally a modern packaging of the same prime bank fraud pattern that U.S. authorities and investor protection bodies have warned about for years. The language is updated, but the structure remains familiar: secrecy, elite access, extraordinary returns, limited windows, and “institutional” jargon used to discourage questions.
For official fraud warnings and pattern recognition, review: Investor.gov (SEC OIEA): Prime Bank Investments Are Scams , SEC: Prime Bank Fraud Information Center , and the U.S. Treasury OIG page on Prime Bank Investment Fraud.
In scam pitches, MT103 is often described as if it can be “generated,” “leased,” “downloaded,” or “released” in a way that creates settlement by itself. That is not how serious payment operations are evaluated. A message format reference alone is not proof of cleared, available, unrestricted funds.
In normal banking usage, MT103 references are used in the context of cross-border payment instructions and payment records. They do not replace due diligence on the sender, recipient, account controls, sanctions screening, or actual settlement status.
For a practical bank-side explanation of MT103 / pacs.008 reporting context, see BNZ’s business banking guidance on SWIFT MT103 / pacs.008 message reports.
The proposal does not identify a recognized financial product governed by a standard framework or clear legal documentation.
They cannot explain which regulated entities, which accounts, and which participant rules govern final settlement.
Basic diligence questions are deflected using confidentiality claims, “private desks,” or invitation-only narratives.
The fee request arrives before any credible evidence of a legitimate instrument, bank process, or commercial use of funds.
Promises of high returns with minimal or no risk are a recurring indicator in prime bank style fraud narratives.
Real infrastructure names are cited, but the described mechanics do not match how those infrastructures are actually used.
Legitimate liquidity transactions are built around recognized instruments, documented obligations, and verifiable cash flow pathways. In trade finance, for example, a real documentary credit discounting request is reviewed against the credit terms, amendments, presentation status, and document compliance, not against undefined transfer acronyms.
If you are dealing with an actual documentary credit and need a legitimate route, use our guide on how to monetize or discount a letter of credit. That process is document-driven and bank-reviewed by design.
Financely operates as a transaction-led advisory desk. We work on real financeable transactions with identifiable counterparties, documentable instruments, and underwriting logic that can be tested. We do not participate in non-standard “program” narratives, hidden transfer schemes, or acronym-led pitches that fail basic diligence.
For service scope, review what we do. For active mandates, use deal submission.
A proposal can sound institutional and still be fictitious. Treat unsupported claims about IPIP, IPID, S2S, “DTC transfers,” private codes, or manual fund downloads as a serious diligence failure unless proven otherwise through verifiable documentation and recognized settlement processes.
If your team has received a proposal built around non-standard transfer acronyms or unverifiable settlement claims, submit the full materials for a structured review. We assess whether the proposed instrument, counterparties, and settlement path align with real market infrastructure and financeable transaction logic.
A useful submission includes the proposal deck, term sheet or offer letter, all party names, any bank references, the intended commercial purpose, and all fee requests. If the file does not pass basic diligence standards, we will say so directly.
Yes. DTC is real market infrastructure associated with securities custody and book-entry settlement functions. The issue is the misuse of the term in fictitious cash transfer narratives.
In most pitches, these terms are presented without a recognized product definition, participant rulebook, or verifiable settlement framework. That is a major diligence concern.
No. Messaging and settlement are not the same thing. A claim about server messaging does not prove final funds availability, legal transfer, or participant-level settlement completion.
An MT103 reference can be relevant in payment operations, but it does not replace full due diligence on sender authenticity, account controls, compliance checks, and settlement status.
Because real institutional language gives credibility to unrealistic claims. The acronym may be real while the described mechanism is not.
Require a recognized instrument, full party identification, a verifiable settlement pathway, and a legitimate commercial purpose. If those are missing, do not proceed and do not pay upfront fees.
Informational only for commercial audiences. This page is general fraud awareness content and is not legal advice, tax advice, or banking advice. Financely does not facilitate non-standard “program” schemes or undefined transfer mechanisms. Any mandate is subject to underwriting, KYC and AML checks, sanctions screening, legal review, and third-party approvals.
Financely advises growth-focused businesses on accessing capital by introducing their opportunities to professional investors. Financely is not a securities broker or dealer. Where appropriate, engagements are coordinated with regulated broker-dealers, investment banks, legal counsel, and other specialists.
Financely does not solicit, offer, or accept orders to buy or sell securities and makes no assurance regarding capital-raising outcomes.
Services are strictly business-to-business. Financely does not provide personal finance, consumer credit, or retail advisory services.
Advisory services are reserved for post-revenue companies that recognize the time and resources required for professional underwriting.
To proceed,
request a quote
and receive indicative commercial terms. If you require guidance before engaging,
book a paid telephone consultation.
Security notice: we are aware of third parties using Financely’s name without authorization. Only emails sent from our official domains and communications through our portal are valid. Please verify any outreach before sharing documents or sending payments, and read our impersonation warning.
Email supportdesk@financely-group.com for general enquiries, press & partnership requests.
All mandates start with an RFQ. We review submissions, issue a brief Go/No-Go memo, and where bankable, release a Term Sheet that leads to funding. We arrange capital across Senior Secured, Unitranche, Second Lien/Mezzanine, Preferred Equity, and Gap Solutions. We do not process deals by email or chat.
Letters of Credit, Standby LCs, Confirmations, Receivables Finance, and Inventory Lines with control.
Funding arranged for trade flows with instruments sized to your cycle and aligned to delivery and settlement.
Move forward to secure working capital and keep goods moving. Submit the RFQ to start underwriting for funding.
Limited or non-recourse structures for energy and infrastructure with lender-ready materials.
Funding solutions aligned to project cash flows with credible covenants and conditions to reach notice to proceed.
Advance the file to termable status. Submit the RFQ so we can underwrite and secure funding.
Debt and Preferred solutions anchored on cash flow, Quality of Earnings, and clear closing mechanics.
Funding across senior, unitranche, and preferred to match stable cash flows and acquisition timelines.
Get financed on workable terms for closing. Submit the RFQ to start underwriting.
Acquisition, development, bridge, and refinance with lender-ready packs and third-party reports managed.
Funding calibrated to DSCR, leverage, and tenancy with terms designed to close.
Move to a financeable package. Submit the RFQ to initiate underwriting for funding.
KYC and Source of Funds required. Engagements are best-efforts and subject to underwriting. Preference for operating companies with meaningful revenue. See our FAQ and Procedure.
Financely Inc. (“Financely”) provides corporate-finance advice and is wholly owned by Aurora Bay Trust, a trust formed under Bahamian law, together with its authorized affiliates. Depending on deal structure, jurisdiction, and local rules, engagements may be carried out through Financely Group LLC, a non-deposit-taking, non-banking financial company; Ashford Capital Advisory LLC; or another related entity.
Financely and its affiliates are not registered as securities broker-dealers and do not execute securities transactions or hold client funds or securities. When a mandate involves the purchase or sale of securities and a registered intermediary is required, any orders are introduced to and executed by one or more independent U.S. broker-dealers registered with the SEC and FINRA. Those broker-dealers are solely responsible for trade execution, custody, and related regulatory obligations. Nothing in this material constitutes an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to buy or sell any security or to engage in any specific transaction. Before engaging Financely Group LLC, Ashford Capital Advisory LLC, or any affiliate, you are responsible for confirming that such engagement complies with your own legal, regulatory, tax, and other requirements. In the United States, certain advisory activities may be conducted in reliance on exemptions available under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, including the “foreign private adviser” exemption where applicable. Our services and regulatory status may vary by jurisdiction and by transaction type.
Click
here to download our brochure. Email
supportdesk@financely-group.com for general enquiries.
