Difference Between Usance and Acceptance LC (UCP600)
Importers want time to pay. Exporters want bank-risk payment. Usance and Acceptance LCs both set a future due date, but the legal promise and discounting path are not the same. This guide lays out the definitions, what gets promised, how the money moves, and when each format fits real deals.
Plain-English definitions
Usance LC (Deferred Payment or UPAS)
An LC with a tenor, for example 30 to 180 days from shipment or from the transport document date. No draft is required for a pure deferred payment LC. The issuing bank promises to pay at maturity if documents are compliant. With UPAS, the seller can be paid at sight by a nominated or confirming bank while the applicant repays at maturity.
Acceptance LC (Time Draft Acceptance)
An LC where the beneficiary draws a time draft (bill of exchange). A bank accepts the draft, creating a clear bank obligation to pay the face value on the due date. The accepted draft can be discounted as a banker's acceptance.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature |
Usance LC |
Acceptance LC |
| Payment method |
Deferred payment at maturity against compliant presentation. No draft needed for pure deferred payment. UPAS can provide sight proceeds to the seller. |
Payment of a time draft that has been accepted by a bank. The accepted draft states the due date. |
| Primary obligation |
Issuing bank undertakes to pay at maturity under UCP600 deferred payment rules or UPAS terms. |
Accepting bank endorses the time draft. That acceptance is a separate bank promise to pay the holder at maturity. |
| Discounting path |
Via negotiation or UPAS. Banks fund at sight and recover from issuer/applicant at maturity. Pricing reflects issuer strength and corridor risk. |
Straightforward. The accepted draft can be sold or discounted as a banker's acceptance. Pricing tracks the accepting bank's name and tenor. |
| Documents required |
Commercial documents only, as per LC text. No draft for pure deferred payment. |
Commercial documents plus a time draft for acceptance. |
| Common wording cues |
“Deferred payment” or “UPAS” stated, maturity basis defined, presentation period stated. |
“Acceptance” stated, draft tenor defined, drawer and drawee identified. |
| Who bears credit risk |
At maturity the beneficiary relies on the issuing bank. If confirmed, the confirming bank adds its undertaking. |
The holder of the accepted draft relies on the accepting bank name at maturity. Confirmation can still be used if needed. |
| Use cases |
Importer wants terms without using a separate loan. Exporter wants either sight proceeds via UPAS or is fine to wait. |
Exporter prefers a discountable bank paper. Markets where banker's acceptances are easily placed. |
How the money moves
Usance LC example
- LC issued as deferred payment 120 days from BL date.
- Exporter ships and presents documents. Nominated bank checks compliance.
- If UPAS is allowed, the nominated or confirming bank pays at sight and holds the receivable to maturity.
- On day 120 the issuing bank pays the nominated or confirming bank. Applicant reimburses under the LC agreement.
Acceptance LC example
- LC requires a 90 day time draft drawn on the issuing or nominated bank.
- Documents are compliant. The bank accepts the draft and stamps the due date.
- Exporter discounts the accepted draft with a bank or holds it to maturity.
- On day 90 the accepting bank pays the holder of the draft.
Wording that avoids friction
Supportive wording
- *
Irrevocable LC subject to UCP600 with tenor stated in days and start date defined.
- *
For acceptance LCs, draft required, drawer and drawee named, tenor clear.
- *
Presentation period, latest shipment, and reimbursement path consistent.
- *
Charges clause and nominated or confirming bank named where needed.
Risk-creating wording
- *
Mixing “deferred payment” and “acceptance” without clarity on which applies.
- *
Ambiguous start date for tenor that conflicts with transport documents.
- *
Bespoke certificates that are hard to produce or verify.
What pricing looks like
Bank fees split into issuance, advising, document checking, and the cost of risk and funding over the tenor. For UPAS or acceptance discounting, add a per-tenor funding margin. Example for 3,000,000 at 120 days: issuance 0.40 percent flat, advising 0.10 percent, document examination 0.10 percent, funding 3.0 to 6.0 percent per annum pro-rated for 120 days, plus any confirmation premium set by bank name and country risk. Final allocation follows the charges clause in the LC.
Which one should you use
Pick Usance LC
- *
You want terms without drafting and handling bills of exchange.
- *
UPAS is available for seller sight proceeds.
- *
Your banks prefer deferred payment mechanics.
Pick Acceptance LC
- *
You want a discountable banker's acceptance with a clear accepting bank name.
- *
Your counterparties are used to draft-based flows.
- *
Secondary market for acceptances is active in your corridor.
Either works if
- *
Issuer and country risk meet bank appetite.
- *
LC wording is tight and dates align.
- *
Documents match the text without surprises.
Frequently asked questions
Is an acceptance LC the same as a usance LC?
Not exactly. Both are time LCs. An acceptance LC requires and creates a bank acceptance of a time draft. A usance LC sets a deferred payment date and can pay at sight via UPAS without a draft.
Which is easier to discount for the exporter?
An accepted draft is straightforward to discount. UPAS is also widely used to achieve sight proceeds under a usance LC. Pricing depends on the bank names and tenor.
Do both formats fall under UCP600?
Yes if the LC states UCP600. Acceptance mechanics for drafts are consistent with UCP600 articles on drafts and acceptance. Deferred payment mechanics follow the deferred payment articles.
What dates should I define to avoid disputes?
Start date for tenor, latest shipment, presentation period, and maturity calculation. Make sure the transport document dates support the tenor start. Keep the reimbursement path clear.
Request Usance or Acceptance LC Indicative Terms
Share your draft LC text, contract or PO, shipment plan, KYC, and financials to receive eligibility feedback and pricing bands.
Request Indicative Terms
Financely acts as advisor and arranger on a best efforts basis. All transactions are subject to KYC and AML, sanctions screening, document compliance, and approvals by counterparties. Nothing here is a commitment to lend or an offer of securities. Terms depend on bank names, jurisdiction, and documentary quality.