Collateral Management Agreements and Stock Management Agreements in Trade Finance
 
 Collateral Management Agreements (CMA) and Stock or Storage Management Agreements (SMA) are two core tools for commodity traders, lenders, and structured trade desks. Both protect lenders when goods are financed and stored, but they serve different purposes and carry different legal and operational duties.
 
  Snapshot: 
A CMA places an independent collateral manager between borrower and lender to control financed goods until repayment. An SMA focuses on monitoring and reporting stock levels when full collateral control is not required. Each is a negotiated contract setting roles, inspection routines, insurance obligations, and release conditions.
 
 Collateral Management Agreements (CMA)
 
 A CMA is a tripartite agreement among the borrower, the financing bank or credit fund, and an independent collateral manager. The manager takes physical control of the financed goods—whether metals in a warehouse or grain in a silo—and releases them only on instructions agreed in the LC or loan facility. This gives the lender comfort that if the borrower defaults, the goods can be liquidated to repay the debt.
 
    | Key Function | Details | 
 
  | Title & Control | Collateral manager acknowledges lender’s security interest and controls access to the goods. | 
 
  | Release Conditions | Goods are released only upon lender’s written instructions, typically after repayment or substitution of collateral. | 
 
  | Insurance & Inspection | Mandatory all-risk insurance plus routine inspection and reporting to track quantity and quality. | 
 
  | Fees | Monthly management fees plus out-of-pocket costs for inspections, security, and audits. | 
 
 
 
 Stock or Storage Management Agreements (SMA)
 
 An SMA is lighter. It is signed when the lender does not need full physical control but wants documented oversight of goods. The storage operator or warehouse commits to regular stock reporting, access for inspection, and notification of abnormal movements. Title often remains with the borrower or a trading SPV.
 
    | Key Function | Details | 
 
  | Monitoring | Warehouse or stock manager monitors inflows and outflows and sends periodic reports to lender. | 
 
  | Access Rights | Lender has inspection rights but not day-to-day control of release. | 
 
  | Cost Level | Lower than a CMA because no round-the-clock supervision is required. | 
 
 
 
 Choosing the Right Agreement
 
 Use a CMA when lender exposure is high, commodity prices are volatile, or counterparty risk is material. An SMA fits lower-risk or short-tenor deals where continuous control is not cost-effective. Some facilities start with a CMA and later convert to SMA as performance builds trust.
 
 Process and Compliance
 
 Both agreements require full KYC and AML checks on all parties and detailed collateral descriptions. Expect legal opinions in each storage jurisdiction, proof of insurance, and signed warehouse undertakings. Fees vary by commodity, location, and inspection frequency.
 
  Request A Collateral or Stock Management Term Sheet
 
 Submit your intake file to structure a CMA or SMA for your next trade finance transaction.
 
  Submit Intake Form 
 
  
 FAQ
 
   Is a CMA mandatory for all commodity finance deals? 
 No. A CMA is used when the lender wants direct collateral control. Lower-risk deals often rely on SMA or simple warehouse receipts.
 
  
  Can a CMA and SMA coexist? 
 Yes. Some programs start with a CMA and later scale down to SMA as credit history builds.
 
  
  What are the cost drivers? 
 Commodity type, storage location, security needs, and inspection frequency. CMA costs are higher because of round-the-clock control.
 
  
  
 This page is for corporate and institutional trade participants. It does not solicit the purchase or sale of securities and is not a commitment to lend. All collateral management structures are subject to underwriting, KYC, AML, sanctions screening, and the appetite of banks or private credit funds.