We provide lender-ready capital raise packaging and debt or equity placement support for business owners and buyers looking to secure serious term sheets and close funding on a defined timeline.
For business owners and acquirers pursuing private debt or equity, submit your deal for review. We revert within one working day with next steps and either a quote for our services.
For pre-submission discussions, we offer paid consultations. To initiate underwriting and lender outreach, submit the deal.
Digital Trade Infrastructure
If you have ever tried to digitise a negotiable shipping document, you hit the same wall fast: you can move PDFs all day, but you still have to replicate possession, endorsement, control, and surrender in a way that is operationally acceptable to carriers, banks, insurers, and trade desks.
Bolero is one of the long running networks that built its stack around that exact problem. At the center is the Core Messaging concept: a controlled message fabric used to exchange trade documents and state changes between authenticated parties, with auditability and a legal framework designed to support document of title workflows.
Think of Core Messaging as the transaction bus for digitised trade documents. Not a chat app. Not an email chain. A controlled workflow layer that ties identity, document integrity, acknowledgements, and lifecycle events into a single operating model.
Useful starting points: Bolero platform overview , technology and security , and the industry push for interoperable eBL standards from DCSA.
In trade digitisation, messaging is not a UI feature, it is the control plane. The minute a document becomes negotiable, you need more than file transfer. You need deterministic state transitions, traceable acknowledgements, and a clean chain of control from holder to holder.
Core Messaging is commonly described as the shared infrastructure layer that sits underneath Bolero services. It supports the exchange of structured trade messages and electronic documents, with security, validation and status feedback mechanics so that participants can operate a digital workflow that mirrors the commercial intent of paper movement.
Why messaging matters: the legal effect in a document of title workflow is tied to who controls the record, when it changes hands, and what was accepted. Messaging becomes the evidence trail.
The bill of lading is not just a shipping receipt. In negotiable form, it is a document of title. That is why digitisation is hard: you must preserve functional equivalence.
If you want a focused primer we will link back to later, see our internal explainer: /bolero-bill-of-lading. That page should cover what a bill of lading is, why title matters, and what changes operationally when the instrument becomes electronic.
From an industry standard angle, DCSA provides a practical baseline on bill of lading data and process standards and the move toward interoperable eBL transactions: DCSA Bill of Lading standard and the broader 100% eBL by 2030 initiative.
When trade desks talk about eBL platforms, there are usually two layers:
The legal layer is not optional if you want negotiability in cross border environments. A key global reference point for functional equivalence is the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records: UNCITRAL MLETR. MLETR is not a platform. It is a legislative model that enables electronic transferable records to be treated like their paper equivalents, including documents of title.
Below is a practical breakdown of the mechanics most teams care about when implementing a Core Messaging style network for trade documents.
| Control Requirement | What The Messaging Layer Enforces | Why It Matters To Banks And Carriers |
|---|---|---|
| Strong participant identity | Authenticated user and organisation membership, permissions, and role based access to document actions. | Prevents anonymous submissions and reduces spoofing risk in title transfer and presentation. |
| Message integrity | Cryptographic protection and tamper evidence on messages and attached electronic records. | Supports reliance on the received record as the same record that was issued. |
| Acknowledgement discipline | Explicit accept, reject, and receive acknowledgements with timestamping. | Creates a clean evidence trail and avoids “we never received it” disputes. |
| Lifecycle state machine | Defined event types such as issue, endorse, transfer, surrender, amendment, and cancellation requests. | Maps operational reality to legal effect, especially for negotiable instruments. |
| Auditability | Immutable logs of who did what, when, and under what authority. | Credit committees, insurers, and compliance teams need defensible logs. |
| Interoperability posture | Ability to connect with internal systems via APIs and with market standards over time. | Scaling requires integration into ERP, TMS, trade back offices, and carrier ecosystems. |
Once you add banks, the conversation shifts to presentation rules and examination logic. Documentary credits and standbys live and die on who presented what, to where, in what format, within what time window.
The ICC eRules environment is the reference point here, especially eUCP which supplements UCP 600 to accommodate electronic presentations: ICC eUCP user guide. Even if you are not running an LC file, the same discipline applies: data location, format, notice, and examination conditions need to be operationally executable.
Common failure mode: a deal team designs a “digital” workflow that looks clean in PowerPoint, then reality hits. The presentation locations are unclear, the electronic record formats are inconsistent, and the parties disagree on what counts as receipt.
Bolero describes its platform as cloud based, with focus on secure connectivity and scalable infrastructure. Their technical overview is a useful reference for how they position the stack and security posture: Bolero Technology and Security and connectivity options: Bolero Connectivity.
From a banking integration perspective, messaging typically expands into SWIFT rails for inter bank and corporate to bank flows, especially when you need secure file exchange at scale. SWIFT FileAct is a standard reference point for bulk document transport: SWIFT FileAct. If you want the trade envelope context, we also maintain an internal guide on trade messaging patterns: SWIFT MT 798 guide.
Digitisation does not reduce compliance burden. It changes the control points. In fact, a fast electronic workflow can amplify loss if controls are weak, because bad documents move faster.
Two credible baseline references that compliance teams lean on:
A Core Messaging layer can help by enforcing identity, logging, and controlled submission routes, but it does not replace KYC, sanctions screening, and transaction plausibility checks.
When Financely packages trade finance transactions, we treat the messaging and document workflow as part of underwriting. It is not an IT footnote. It affects enforceability, operational execution, and secondary distribution appetite.
We map who issues, who holds, who endorses, and how surrender happens. If the lifecycle is vague, lenders price it as execution risk.
We remove non executable conditions and align presentation locations, formats, and acceptance logic so a desk can actually run the file.
We reference standards and counterpart readiness, especially where eBL interoperability and carrier acceptance drive feasibility.
Credit committees want to see who controls the document of title at each point in time. We make that explicit.
Author: Daniel Mercer, Trade Documentation and Operations Specialist
Daniel has worked across documentary trade operations, electronic presentation workflows, and digitised shipping documentation rollouts supporting banks and corporate trade teams. His work focuses on turning rulebooks and standards into executable operating procedures that pass credit, compliance, and audit scrutiny.
No. SWIFT is a financial messaging network with specific rails such as FileAct and FIN. Core Messaging refers to the controlled workflow layer used to exchange trade documents and lifecycle events between authenticated participants. They can be complementary in real deployments.
Not by itself. Negotiability depends on the legal framework applied to the electronic record and the enforceability of the control method in the relevant jurisdictions. MLETR is a key legislative model for functional equivalence.
Because control of the document of title affects collateral control and dispute risk. If the holder chain is unclear, the file gets priced as operational and legal risk.
Vague answers on who can transfer title, how acknowledgements work, and what happens when parties reject or fail to respond. If the lifecycle cannot be described in steps, it is not ready for institutional credit.
Start with the instrument basics and the operational meaning of title transfer. Use our internal page: /bolero-bill-of-lading and then map how your eBL workflow replicates endorsement and surrender.
If your transaction depends on eBL control, document workflows, and bank acceptance, submit your deal so we can structure the documentation, operating procedure, and underwriting pack for lender review.
Submit Your DealThis page is for general information only and does not constitute legal, tax, investment, or regulatory advice. Financely does not custody client funds. Digital trade outcomes depend on counterparties, governing law, compliance screening including KYC, AML and sanctions, and executed definitive documentation.
Financely advises growth-focused businesses on accessing capital by introducing their opportunities to professional investors. Financely is not a securities broker or dealer. Where appropriate, engagements are coordinated with regulated broker-dealers, investment banks, legal counsel, and other specialists.
Financely does not solicit, offer, or accept orders to buy or sell securities and makes no assurance regarding capital-raising outcomes.
Services are strictly business-to-business. Financely does not provide personal finance, consumer credit, or retail advisory services.
Advisory services are reserved for post-revenue companies that recognize the time and resources required for professional underwriting.
To proceed,
request a quote
and receive indicative commercial terms. If you require guidance before engaging,
book a paid telephone consultation.
Security notice: we are aware of third parties using Financely’s name without authorization. Only emails sent from our official domains and communications through our portal are valid. Please verify any outreach before sharing documents or sending payments, and read our impersonation warning.
Email supportdesk@financely-group.com for general enquiries, press & partnership requests.
All mandates start with an RFQ. We review submissions, issue a brief Go/No-Go memo, and where bankable, release a Term Sheet that leads to funding. We arrange capital across Senior Secured, Unitranche, Second Lien/Mezzanine, Preferred Equity, and Gap Solutions. We do not process deals by email or chat.
Letters of Credit, Standby LCs, Confirmations, Receivables Finance, and Inventory Lines with control.
Funding arranged for trade flows with instruments sized to your cycle and aligned to delivery and settlement.
Move forward to secure working capital and keep goods moving. Submit the RFQ to start underwriting for funding.
Limited or non-recourse structures for energy and infrastructure with lender-ready materials.
Funding solutions aligned to project cash flows with credible covenants and conditions to reach notice to proceed.
Advance the file to termable status. Submit the RFQ so we can underwrite and secure funding.
Debt and Preferred solutions anchored on cash flow, Quality of Earnings, and clear closing mechanics.
Funding across senior, unitranche, and preferred to match stable cash flows and acquisition timelines.
Get financed on workable terms for closing. Submit the RFQ to start underwriting.
Acquisition, development, bridge, and refinance with lender-ready packs and third-party reports managed.
Funding calibrated to DSCR, leverage, and tenancy with terms designed to close.
Move to a financeable package. Submit the RFQ to initiate underwriting for funding.
KYC and Source of Funds required. Engagements are best-efforts and subject to underwriting. Preference for operating companies with meaningful revenue. See our FAQ and Procedure.
Financely Inc. (“Financely”) provides corporate-finance advice and is wholly owned by Aurora Bay Trust, a trust formed under Bahamian law, together with its authorized affiliates. Depending on deal structure, jurisdiction, and local rules, engagements may be carried out through Financely Group LLC, a non-deposit-taking, non-banking financial company; Ashford Capital Advisory LLC; or another related entity.
Financely and its affiliates are not registered as securities broker-dealers and do not execute securities transactions or hold client funds or securities. When a mandate involves the purchase or sale of securities and a registered intermediary is required, any orders are introduced to and executed by one or more independent U.S. broker-dealers registered with the SEC and FINRA. Those broker-dealers are solely responsible for trade execution, custody, and related regulatory obligations. Nothing in this material constitutes an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to buy or sell any security or to engage in any specific transaction. Before engaging Financely Group LLC, Ashford Capital Advisory LLC, or any affiliate, you are responsible for confirming that such engagement complies with your own legal, regulatory, tax, and other requirements. In the United States, certain advisory activities may be conducted in reliance on exemptions available under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, including the “foreign private adviser” exemption where applicable. Our services and regulatory status may vary by jurisdiction and by transaction type.
Click
here to download our brochure. Email
supportdesk@financely-group.com for general enquiries.
