We provide lender-ready capital raise packaging and debt or equity placement support for business owners and buyers looking to secure serious term sheets and close funding on a defined timeline.
For business owners and acquirers pursuing private debt submit your deal for review. We revert within one working day with next steps and either a quote for our services.
Finance your next trade, project or acquisition.
Debt structuring, targeted lender outreach and negotiation support through closing.
Paid advisory. Upfront retainer applies.
AI Lender Match helps business owners, investors, and sponsors identify lenders that fit their deal profile without wasting weeks on cold outreach. Get a smarter starting point for acquisitions, commercial real estate, trade finance, and structured debt transactions.
A mineral deposit can be worth hundreds of millions of dollars on paper and still leave its owner unable to pay a drilling contractor. Reserves in the ground cannot be sold on an exchange, deposited at a bank or handed to a lender as a cheque. They only become cash when someone with capital is persuaded that the metal can be extracted, processed, sold and paid for, on a timeline and at a cost they can underwrite.
This guide explains how that conversion actually happens. It covers the reporting standards that turn geology into a bankable asset, the main financing routes (offtake prepayments, streams and royalties, reserve-based and project lending, government-backed capital, and partial asset sales), and what capital providers look for before they commit.
Value in the ground is a forecast, not a balance. An undeveloped deposit generates no revenue. Its value depends on grade, tonnage, metallurgy, mining method, capital cost, operating cost, commodity prices, permits, infrastructure and the jurisdiction's legal stability. Every one of those variables is a risk a financier has to price before any money moves.
There is no deep secondary market for a mining licence. Unlike listed equities or warehoused metal, a licence or concession usually has a small pool of credible buyers, each of whom will run months of technical and legal diligence. Transfers often need ministerial or regulatory consent, and change of control clauses in mining codes can add further approvals.
The asset cannot be pledged in the simple sense. Many jurisdictions vest subsoil minerals in the state, so what the company owns is a right to extract, not the minerals themselves. Lenders take security over the licence, the project company's shares, the plant, the bank accounts and the sales contracts. They do not take security over "the reserves" as a standalone object, which is why the financing always comes back to the cash flows the reserves can produce.
The current market makes the conversion easier for the right assets. The IEA Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 reports that critical mineral prices rebounded in 2025 and early 2026, with lithium prices more than doubling, cobalt rising by around 130 percent after Congolese export restrictions, and copper reaching record highs. Higher prices and supply security concerns have widened the pool of buyers, traders and governments willing to commit capital to deposits outside the most concentrated supply chains.
Financiers fund reserves, not stories. Most serious capital providers rely on estimates prepared under a code aligned with the CRIRSCO International Reporting Template, such as JORC in Australasia, NI 43-101 and the CIM Definition Standards in Canada, SAMREC in South Africa or PERC in Europe. These codes separate exploration results from Mineral Resources (Inferred, Indicated, Measured) and from Mineral Reserves (Probable, Proved), the economically mineable portion supported by at least a pre-feasibility study.
The United States follows the same logic. Under Regulation S-K 1300, adopted by the SEC in October 2018, a registrant's disclosure of resources and reserves must rest on a technical report summary signed by a qualified person. For a private owner seeking finance, an equivalent independent report is the starting point of every credible conversation.
The practical consequence is simple. An Inferred Resource can attract equity and some early-stage royalty capital. A Probable or Proved Reserve backed by a feasibility study, permits and a credible offtake path can attract debt. Moving the asset up that ladder is usually the single biggest lever an owner has on the amount and cost of capital available.
Each route trades a different slice of the asset's future value for cash today. Most real transactions combine two or more of them.
Offtake prepayments, streams and royalties advance cash against metal that has not yet been mined. They are often the fastest non-dilutive capital available to a near-production asset and are frequently structured through structured commodity finance.
Senior project loans and reserve-based facilities lend against the forecast cash flows of the mine, with security over the licence, plant and contracts. Sizing is driven by cover ratios, not the headline in-situ value. See our approach to project finance.
Export credit agencies and development finance institutions now treat critical minerals as strategic. Their participation can lengthen tenors and crowd in commercial banks, sometimes alongside credit enhancement such as guarantees or political risk cover.
A partial sale, joint venture or earn-in hands a portion of the deposit to a partner in exchange for cash or funded work. It is dilutive at the asset level but can unlock development without adding debt.
| Route | What the owner gives up, and when it fits |
|---|---|
| Offtake prepayment | Commits a share of production to a trader or smelter, usually at market-linked pricing, and repays the advance through deliveries. Fits assets in production or within roughly 12 to 24 months of first concentrate. |
| Stream | Sells a percentage of a metal, often a by-product, for an upfront deposit plus a fixed or percentage-of-spot payment on delivery. Fits development or producing assets with meaningful precious metal or cobalt credits. |
| Royalty | Grants a percentage of revenue or net smelter return for a single upfront payment. Available earlier in the asset's life, including some pre-development stages. |
| Senior project or reserve-based debt | Adds leverage, covenants, reserve tails and security packages. Fits assets with a bankable feasibility study, permits, offtake and an equity contribution. |
| ECA or DFI participation | Adds policy conditions such as offtake destination, environmental and social standards and procurement rules. Fits strategic minerals in eligible jurisdictions. |
| Partial sale or joint venture | Gives up ownership and some control. Fits owners who lack development capability or need to fund a feasibility study before any debt is possible. |
Traders pay today to secure tomorrow's tonnes. In a prepayment, a commodity trader or smelter advances cash to the producer and is repaid from the sale proceeds of concentrate delivered under a linked offtake contract. The trader takes performance risk on the mine and in return secures supply, marketing margin and often a financing spread.
The structure has become standard in copper. Fastmarkets reported in January 2026 that Mercuria agreed a USD 250 million prepayment with Bulgaria's Geotechmin alongside an offtake for all of the Ellatzite mine's 2026 copper concentrate. In February 2026, Orion Minerals executed a USD 250 million prepayment facility with Glencore to fund the restart of its Prieska copper and zinc mine in South Africa, settled through concentrate deliveries.
What drives the terms. Prepayment size is set by forecast deliveries, price assumptions, the trader's credit appetite for the jurisdiction and the strength of collection mechanics such as offshore collection accounts and assignment of receivables. Intercreditor arrangements matter, as the Prieska deal shows, because prepayments often sit alongside streams, royalties or development finance. For a deeper look at how these structures are assembled, see our guide to physical commodity trading and structured trade finance.
A stream buys metal, a royalty buys revenue. Under the model described by Wheaton Precious Metals, the streamer pays an upfront deposit for a percentage of a mine's metal production, plus an ongoing payment per unit when the metal is delivered. The miner treats the deposit as non-dilutive capital. A royalty, by contrast, is a single upfront payment for a percentage of revenue or net smelter return, with no ongoing payment per unit.
Streams are most efficient where the target metal is a by-product. A copper miner that also produces gold or silver can monetize metal that sits outside its core business case, often at a better valuation than the equity market would give it. Ticket sizes can be large. Nasdaq reported in 2026 that Wheaton provided USD 300 million upfront for a gold stream as part of a wider financing package when an asset changed hands from Barrick.
The hidden cost. Streams and royalties are senior claims on production that survive refinancing and often a sale of the mine. They reduce the cash flow available to future lenders, so they need to be sized with the full capital structure in mind rather than as a quick fix.
Oil and gas has the template. Reserve-based lending is most developed in upstream oil and gas, where banks lend against a borrowing base recalculated periodically from engineered reserve reports. The OCC's Comptroller's Handbook on oil and gas exploration and production lending sets out how examiners assess these collateral-focused facilities, including reserve depletion and the treatment of different reserve categories.
Mining usually relies on project finance instead. Hard rock deposits are less homogeneous than oil fields, so mining debt is typically sized as limited recourse project finance. Lenders model the mine plan, apply price decks and stress cases, and set the loan by debt service coverage, loan life coverage and a reserve tail, meaning a portion of reserves must remain after the loan is repaid. Expect requirements for completion support, a debt service reserve account, hedging and cost overrun facilities.
This is where preparation pays off. A credit memo, model review and sources and uses that already answer a lender's first round of questions can shave months off a process. That is the purpose of our Lender-Ready Package, and our project finance advisory deliverables show the full path from bankability assessment to financial close.
Critical minerals are now a policy priority, and capital follows policy. The Export-Import Bank of the United States runs a Supply Chain Resiliency Initiative that finances overseas critical minerals projects. EXIM explains on its SCRI guidance page that projects need signed offtake contracts with US buyers, and that the amount it can finance is linked to the size of that offtake.
The US International Development Finance Corporation has moved further up the capital structure. In a 2026 press release, DFC confirmed it had closed a USD 600 million investment in the USD 1.8 billion Orion Critical Mineral Consortium. Mining Weekly reported in October 2026 that DFC holds more than USD 3 billion of critical minerals commitments in Africa and plans more direct equity investment.
European, Canadian, Japanese, Korean and Australian agencies run comparable programmes. Their involvement rarely replaces commercial lenders. It typically extends tenor, absorbs political risk and gives banks the comfort to commit, provided the project meets environmental, social and governance standards and the agency's eligibility rules.
Dilution at the asset level can be cheaper than dilution at the company level. Owners without the balance sheet to fund a feasibility study often farm out a stake through an earn-in, where a partner funds a defined work programme in exchange for an increasing interest. A straight partial sale or joint venture with a strategic buyer, smelter or trader can also bring cash, technical capability and offtake in a single transaction.
The trade-off is control. Joint venture agreements need careful drafting on funding obligations, dilution formulas, operatorship, pre-emption rights and marketing of product. An owner who gives these away cheaply at the exploration stage can find the most valuable phase of the asset's life captured by a partner.
The best outcomes come from sequencing, not from a single cheque. A typical development path might use a royalty or earn-in to fund the feasibility study, a stream on by-product metals to cover part of construction, a trader prepayment tied to the first years of concentrate, and senior project debt with ECA or DFI cover for the balance. Each layer is priced against the risk it takes, so the blended cost of capital falls as the asset de-risks.
Order matters. A royalty or stream granted early reduces the cash flow available to senior lenders later, and a prepayment with broad security can block a project finance package. Structuring the stack from the top down, with the senior debt case in mind from day one, protects the owner's equity and keeps every financing option open.
Technical. An independent resource and reserve statement under a recognised code, signed by a competent or qualified person, plus the study (scoping, pre-feasibility or feasibility) that supports it, metallurgical test work and a mine plan.
Legal. Clear title to the licence or concession, evidence of good standing, permits issued or a credible permitting timeline, surface rights and any community agreements, and a review of the mining code's rules on transfer, change of control and security.
Commercial. Offtake terms or strong market evidence, a logistics route to port or smelter, power and water supply, and a realistic capital and operating cost estimate.
Financial. A financial model with price decks and sensitivities, a sources and uses table showing the sponsor's equity contribution, existing encumbrances such as royalties or streams, and audited accounts for the project company and sponsor.
Owners who arrive with all four strands in order are negotiating terms. Owners who arrive with a licence and an in-situ value estimate are usually still negotiating whether anyone will look at the deal. Our debt underwriting services are designed to close that gap before an asset goes to market.
Financely assesses mining and resource assets, structures the right mix of prepayment, stream, debt and strategic capital, and prepares the credit package lenders expect to see before they commit time to a deal.
If your asset has an independent technical report and a realistic path to production, share the details and we will tell you which routes are open, what they are likely to require and what the work involves.
Yes, but lenders lend against the cash flows the reserves can produce, not their in-situ value. That requires a reserve statement under a recognised code, a feasibility-level mine plan, permits, an offtake path and a sponsor equity contribution. Without these, early capital usually comes from equity, royalties or partners.
A Mineral Resource is a concentration of minerals with reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. A Mineral Reserve is the economically mineable part of a Measured or Indicated Resource, supported by at least a pre-feasibility study that applies mining, processing, economic, legal and environmental modifying factors.
Neither is better in the abstract. Streams and royalties are non-dilutive and carry no repayment schedule, but they are long-term claims on production that reduce cash flow for future lenders. Debt is cheaper when the asset is bankable but brings covenants and repayment risk. Most developers use a combination sized against the full capital structure.
A prepayment for a producing mine can close in a few months if the technical and legal files are in order. Project finance for a development asset commonly takes far longer because of feasibility work, permitting, lender diligence and documentation. Timelines depend heavily on how complete the owner's information is at the start.
No. Financely is an advisory and arranging firm. We assess, structure and prepare the transaction and introduce it to suitable lenders, traders, streamers and institutional investors, who make their own credit decisions.
This article is general information only and is not legal, tax, accounting or investment advice. Financely is an advisory and arranging firm, not a lender or broker-dealer. Any financing is subject to underwriting, due diligence, credit approval, documentation and conditions precedent set by the capital provider. No outcome, amount or timeline is guaranteed.
Submit your deal using our secure intake form, and receive a quote within 1-3 business days. Existing clients can connect with their relationship manager through our secure web portal.
All submissions are
promptly reviewed, and all communications are conducted through the intake form or the client portal for a seamless and secure process.
Thank you for considering working with us. A nominal fee of US$500 is required upon completion of each form. This fee covers the time and effort we invest in reviewing your submission and crafting a thorough proposal. We receive numerous inquiries and prioritize those that carry this fee, ensuring serious applicants receive prompt attention.
Tap into solutions like letters of credit, bank guarantees, and payment facilitation. We address the challenge of global transaction risk through structured strategies that foster cross-border growth. Complete the form to unlock streamlined funding aligned with your commercial objectives.
Submit a RequestAccess non-recourse funding for infrastructure, renewable energy, or other capital-intensive ventures. We mitigate capital constraints by isolating project assets and focusing on risk management. Provide your details to receive a structure that drives growth and maximizes returns.
Submit a RequestSecure financing for business or real estate acquisitions. We ease transaction hurdles by reviewing cash flow, synergy opportunities, and exit plans. Complete the form for a customized proposal that supports your strategic investment objectives.
Submit a RequestFinancely assists banks facing Basel III pressures by distributing trade finance deals and providing collateral for letters of credit. We reduce capital burdens while preserving client relationships and fostering service expansion. Submit your request to optimize your trade finance offerings.
Submit a RequestOnce we receive your submission, our team will review your information to determine feasibility. If eligible, you will receive a proposal or term sheet within 1–3 business days. Visit our FAQ and Procedure pages for more information.
Disclaimer: Financely provides financing based on due diligence and feasibility. Approval is not guaranteed, and past performance does not predict future outcomes. All terms are subject to review. Financely primarily assists with structuring and distribution. Qualified parties carry out the project if the client approves the proposal.